Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
According to the author, laws cannot guarantee the justice to the problems of the human society. In this modern world, judicial system helps to provide justice to the ones who are not treated according to the law. However, there may be certain case in which laws and judicial system has been unable to program effectively as it should have.
Firstly, today's world manifests it's practicability through its interactrion with humans and the economy. Lets take an example as the result of the crimes that are frequently happening in the different parts of the world. Let's take a prominient case of Saddam Hussain. He had done to sabotage the democratic principles of the native country where he was born. And he has not done anything that helps to foster the peace and prosperity of the nation. Because of this, he was later hanged, this shows that the judicial system is still in charge if any misconduct in the society happens. To achieve the utmost peace, nations has built their own judicial system and to give what citizens of the country desire- peace and happiness.
Secondly, Laws are the creation of humans which in itself is not perfect. Sometimes due to the lack of evidence and the mis-interpretation of the technical terms, the culprit may escape and the victims may have to suffer. For example: In shashank redemption movie, defrune was framed for murdering his wife. In fact the murder was not commited by him. Due to the lack of evidence and what the laws require to completely decide is according to the evidence what the forensics has collected. In such case, he was jailed and made to suffer.
To sum up, laws manifest according to the specific rule and criteria. If the judges who are heading the judicial system are convinced by the documents that are presented then the decision goes to the one who is favourable. Nonetheless, laws and legal system has been prominent in eradicating the crimes that are unsual to our society to digest and thrive on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...teractrion with humans and the economy. Lets take an example as the result of the cr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ng in the different parts of the world. Lets take a prominient case of Saddam Hussai...
^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... And he has not done anything that helps to foster the peace and prosperity of t...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not done anything that helps to foster the peace and prosperity of the nation. ...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t may escape and the victims may have to suffer. For example: In shashank redempt...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ding to the specific rule and criteria. If the judges who are heading the judicial...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83185840708 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61995730122 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519174041298 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5304073314 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2105263158 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193563918625 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542060595163 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639783855492 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123928812473 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760042770571 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.