Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
To research and resolve the mysteries of the unknowns of a particular field is the dream and aim of every researcher or PhD student. But with scattered mind no researcher could see his/her dream come true. Therefore, researchers should intense their research to those fields in which they are sure to find practical applications.
Intense research in a particular field would result in a better solution. Like if a scientist research haphazardly, he might never get the required consequences. For example, if a PhD student researching in embedded systems and Artificial intelligence for the medical devices would rather focus on bitcoin and blockhain technology in spite of doing intensified research in the aforementioned areas, he will not complete his degree on time and remain entangled in resolving bitcoin mystery. The case is same if the physician investigating black holes or Einstein theory of relativity would focus on chemical bonding or even more worse in integrated chips. Therefore, researchers would not get anything useful for their results if they scatter their research to other areas.
Secondly, if the enthusiast does focused work, he will complete his research in a shorter time. Like the previously mentioned physician would get numerous beneficial knowledge if he focus on irrelevant subjects, but he would not get anything applicable to his subjects, even more worse, the time would also be waisted. However, if he would focus to the intense areas from where he expects to get the applicable results, he will complete his work efficiently in a lesser time. So, researchers should focus on the areas applicable to his findings if they wanted to complete their work atleast on time.
However, expectations can go wrong. If the researcher would focus in a wrong direction then the results will be worse than expected and umpteen time will be waisted. So, researcher should consider this also if he is not damn sure about the consequences or know nothing about how to start or work for his research.
In short, intensified and focused work have better consequences if scientist or researcher can expect the consequences beforehand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e sure to find practical applications. Intense research in a particular field w...
^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...research haphazardly, he might never get the required consequences. For example, ...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...telligence for the medical devices would rather focus on bitcoin and blockhain te...
^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...would focus on chemical bonding or even more worse in integrated chips. Therefore, researc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scatter their research to other areas. Secondly, if the enthusiast does focused...
^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'focuses', 'focusses'.
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...get numerous beneficial knowledge if he focus on irrelevant subjects, but he would no...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...ything applicable to his subjects, even more worse, the time would also be waisted. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...focus to the intense areas from where he expects to get the applicable results, h...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs if they wanted to complete their work atleast on time. However, expectatio...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... complete their work atleast on time. However, expectations can go wrong. If t...
^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will be worse than expected and umpteen time will be waisted. So, researcher sho...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how to start or work for his research. In short, intensified and focused work h...
^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...focused work have better consequences if scientist or researcher can expect the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in short, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21902017291 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9420173272 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481268011527 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4397385004 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1875 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204271352677 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921487857061 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730419359309 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136538802168 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672237409381 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.