Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Author’s claim that “Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application” and for validating claim Author posits that it is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty, In my opinion, author’s claim holds some merit as research is itself is an immediate activity and researcher should not immured their research work in certain areas, If researcher do so, he/she might fail to make striking discoveries. Following are the reasons for my accordance with the author.
Firstly, considering current scenario, Each and every field is obscure enough, so that researchers can discover something novel or putting it in other way, each and every field has something to offer. Consider a situation, if newton has confined his investigations to areas that doesn’t include the ‘physics’, did he able to come up with gravitational law? Thus researchers should be more concerned about their ideas instead of the area. The process of confining will lead to obviating the talent of researchers.
Secondly, on what basis researcher will decide the areas that will lead to immediate and practical discovery? Thus, researcher instead of confining their area of discovery should follow their notions, which will ultimately result into success. By confining areas of research works, researcher may elude making most important discovery of their life. Researchers should be allowed to perform their discoveries in their predilection areas, even though their discoveries may fail to contribute towards ameliorating social and economic problems prevailing in society.
Thirdly, if Government limits the field of researcher, so that their discoveries can have good impact on people lives, should elude taking such steps. Government should not consider discoveries as a medium for betterment of people lives because discoveries also enlighten people about existence of past life, behaviors of extinct creatures, and many more. Consider an example, if government have forced researchers to work in areas that can help making people lives better, would Copernicus would able to correct people about the notion of earth revolution around the sun or would people would able to know about the certain phenomenon which results into existence of such life on earth. Every discovery holds some importance in one’s life it may be practical or theoretical.
On wrapping up, Government should take various initiatives to promote the research work held by researchers instead of confining their work areas. Researches should not be impetus about making immediate discoveries by confining their research work area instead should follow their predilection that can lead to making striking discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'immure'
Suggestion: immure
...iate activity and researcher should not immured their research work in certain areas, I...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...able to come up with gravitational law? Thus researchers should be more concerned ab...
^^^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...earchers to work in areas that can help making people lives better, would Copernicus w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 782, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife it may be practical or theoretical. On wrapping up, Government should take v...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61948955916 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08094441622 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489559164733 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 119.265574848 60.3974514979 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9375 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402476062058 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126339842716 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121845126807 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235654241632 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155454054114 0.0667264976115 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.