Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Author’s claim “Universities should require every student to take variety of courses outside the student’s field of study” in certain cases, in my opinion, author’s claim holds credence as subjects are interdependent and for professing in any subject student should have basic knowledge about other fields. Following are the reasons for my accordance with the author’s claim.
Firstly, Universities is a place where student rely most for acquiring knowledge which can help them in construing the world around them. Thus, it is sole responsibility of the university to impart sufficient knowledge to their students, so that they can excel in their career. During my Bachelor’s degree in information technology, I have studied basic concepts about electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc. In my university during first year of engineering, each and every students had been taught about others fields so that students can have the basic knowledge about each and every field and can understand how each and every field is contributing in making the world. Not only for interpreting the world around us having knowledge about other fields also helps in making student versatile in performing tasks. Considering current situation, many companies are demanding students who are capable in performing more than one task as having such employees will benefits company in terms of efficiency as well as financially (as less employees need to be hired). Thus, having knowledge of courses outside the student’s field of study will provide them an edge in acquiring more responsible job and also enlighten them with knowledge which in turn help them in understanding the world around them.
Secondly, Each subject is not plenary enough, thus if one need to make advancement in any subject, he/she need to have knowledge and experience of other fields. Consider and example, In artificial intelligence domain, specifically robotics field, one need to have knowledge about circuits (electrical engineering), mechanical parts (mechanical engineering), computer science field, etc. for successfully implementing their notions in reality. Consider other example, in past, computer used to acquire whole room whereas considering current situation computers (laptop’s) have became soo handy that one can travel with computer with great ease. If person not having knowledge about microprocessors, reducing the size using more compact parts, etc. would able to make such advancement? Thus, Learning other courses outside the field of study will help in making striking advancement in his/her field of study.
On wrapping up, Outside knowledge will be great boon for a student to make any contribution in his/her field of study, it will also provide them knowledge about existing phenomenon resulting in world around them. In job perspective also, student having knowledge about field other their field of study will also increase their job chances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 983, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
... one task as having such employees will benefits company in terms of efficiency as well ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1049, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun employees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...of efficiency as well as financially as less employees need to be hired. Thus, havin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ons in reality. Consider other example, in past, computer used to acquire whole room wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... situation computers laptop's have became soo handy that one can travel with comp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will also increase their job chances.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, of course, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62305986696 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06070556329 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472283813747 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.5838386606 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.888888889 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265988721597 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813069368556 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945289957087 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178132671513 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077129646747 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.