Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the learning process is bolstered or hindered by opposing point of views. Indisputably, excessive disagreement can cause stress, however it could be extremely helpful. Thus, I generally disagree with the both the claim and the reason proposed.
The main reason which leads me to refute the claim and the reason on which it is based is the historical evidence that shows how disagreement does not inhibit learning but actually bolters it. Human beings are not perfect by nature and thus even what has been produced by them. Shared point of views on the same topic will hardly identify what lacks on a specific theory or idea. For instance, the Catholic Church was firmly sure about the geocentric view and tried to stop any different views about this issue. What was needed to start to spread the heliocentric view was Giordano Bruno. Bruno was clearly the opposite part who bolstered and not inhibit learning among people. Without his presence, it would have been impossible for someone into the Catholic Church to spread this view since everyone was in accordance with the geocentric view. Moreover, the historical evidence is plentiful: Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Malcom X are only few that oppose their view and speed up the development.
In addition, also everyday life offers opportunity to see that opposing point of views actually does not hinder the learning process. In any academic fields, any new idea from a researcher starts from analyzing what lacks in another work which has been previously done. Therefore, even in this case the disagreement is the starting point for something new. For instance, the two physicists Einstein and Bohr had contrasting views on several issues concerning the validity of the quantum mechanics. However, their debates have certainly been helpful for its development. Moreover, politics have always been based on contrasting point of views on several problems. Even when one political party wins the election there is always a minority party who represents the opposite point of views. So far, the introduction of politic has fostered development in modern society. Disagreement could cause distress in specific circumstances, for instance, when a shared result wants to be achieved. The success of Apple, Microsoft or Lamborghini could not have been achieved with disagreement about how to conduct the business inside the company.
In conclusion, disagreement both historically and in everyday life has bolstered the learning process and it could be dangerous only in specific circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing point of views on several problems. Even when one political party wins the election t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30024213075 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7890750978 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532687651332 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.482078591 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18641767522 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524112086783 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435897661311 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111316267194 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351898632211 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.