Claim: While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self-satisfaction, it should really be a source of embarrassment.
Reason: Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self-motivation.
The argument that boredom is the reflection of self-satisfaction stems from the perception that self-contented people have nothing remaining in their life to cherish. In contrast to this position, a plain observation into a day of happy and successful people reflects that the mirthful people are consistently active, both physically and mentally. Opposite to this is the case of people living in boredom, who lack vitality and ultimately end in mental problems like depression. Therefore, boredom shouldn’t be synonymous to self-satisfaction; instead, it should be considered as the sign of diffidence and fragile psychology.
People living active life involve themselves in creative and imaginative activities. Their ingenuity motivates them to explore new possibilities, learn, innovate and contribute. These people never find a reason to stay idle. Famous scientists like Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin are remembered for their consistent effort, at all times of their life. Einstein, even at his death-bed, was pondering upon most difficult conundrums of physics. Darwin never stated being bored while working on the complex ideas of evolution of species for hours for years. These famous people never complained of their life, rather credited the most challenging and difficult circumstances for making them more creative. The people enjoying glory and applaud are ultimately those who devote consistently to their cause and passion. It is undoubted that a brain driven by passion and enthusiasm never finds a cause to vegetate.
However, defining boredom as self-satisfaction is nothing more than an excuse and pointless boast. Self-satisfaction arises from knowledge and achievement. And, these can’t be gained without an active effort. Those with boredom, lack these characters; thus achieve less in their life. They neither gain social reputation nor self-actualization. Their esteem can’t parallel to that of an active person. In social situations, they find themselves colorless and humiliated. It causes nothing but embarrassment: life without any purpose appears futile. It ultimately leads to serious physical and mental diseases, concluding their life in depression and suicide.
Boredom is not confined within the age group, physical condition or social situations of an individual. It is merely a state of mind. Mahatma Gandhi, even at his old age, fought for the freedom of his people. There are many physically challenged mountaineers who, due to their imperturbable motivation, climbed the summit of Mt. Everest. Famous scientists like Einstein, Neil’s Bhor, Madam Curie, continued their work and made significant discoveries even at the timeof world war. We can never find the terms as giving up, being bored or similar in their biographies. Thus boredom is antagonistic to creativity and determination. One can easily find a cause to stay bored, at any time and situation, if one wishes to.
The contrast between active people and those with boredom reveals that boredom is resulted by the lack of imagination, effort and self-esteem which eventually leads to social alienation and embarrassment, resulting problems with the mind and body. Therefore, there is no point in encouraging boredom by tagging it wrongly as self-satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 574, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... bored or similar in their biographies. Thus boredom is antagonistic to creativity a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agging it wrongly as self-satisfaction.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2798.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64112903226 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23722713686 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 868.5 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1743593438 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4375 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28125 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233365746911 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587025131912 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749218759575 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152572232616 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951951469809 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.