Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Every day, people are leaving comments on other person’s post, news acticle, published research paper written by respected psychologist and new album made by a band. Literally, people make judgments on everything. The statement is contending that only the expert of the field could make a critical judgment of the work. I agree that the judgment from the expert is quite critical but it doesn’t mean the comments of non expert is meaningless or has less value.
The proponents of the argument would say from the word “critical”, it means the judgment should make people convince and understand the work, not just at ostensible area, but also in deeper area. Only the master of the field could do this job. it is quite true when the judgment of the field needs profound knowledge and acute insight. For example, when the candidates of the science Nobel prize are announced, we can always find out that we have never heard of the names of the candidates. However, we could trust that those candidates’ achievements are plausable because experts of the field agree and explain why they should get such an honorable prize, how their achievements affected our lives or extanded the boundary of knowledge of humanity.
However, not all fields need such knowledge and insights. Fields such as POP musics or movies, on the other hand, is quite different from the field that was mentioned above. Such field which are mainly directly aimed to normal people is estimated by how much people like or dislike it. Because the main evulation point of the field that are related with mass media is popularity, the critical judgment of the field would be made by the audience, not by the expert. It is true that there are critics who wrote quotes and comments about how the movie was good or why the music should be blamed, it doesn’t mean the movie or the music should be unpopular. The exemplar would be the Caribean’s Pirate series. As the series go on, the critics scarcely commented the storyline is too messy. However, the people still love to watch Jonny Depp’s acting Jack Sparrow, leaving “critical” judgment that series would leave its mark on the history of movie.
In conclusion, I recommend to adjust the statement from “any given field” to “most fields” as some fields which are mostly related with mass media has subtle different aspect of critical judgment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is meaningless or has less value. The proponents of the argument would say...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... master of the field could do this job. it is quite true when the judgment of the ...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oundary of knowledge of humanity. However, not all fields need such knowle...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 255, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ed to normal people is estimated by how much people like or dislike it. Because the ...
^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its mark on the history of movie. In conclusion, I recommend to adjust the...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 18, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend adjusting'.
Suggestion: recommend adjusting
...of movie. In conclusion, I recommend to adjust the statement from 'any given fiel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11691542289 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.874099039 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7500676307 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.277777778 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212371467915 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757559491621 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633861420841 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150452401212 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349871730002 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.