Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Critical judgement of a task in any field does have little value unless it comes from an expert of that field. However, in my opinion this is true in some fields only.
Experts of a particular field have precise knowledge of the mechanics and processes that take place in that field. They are well aware of these facts and details unlike a layman does. Consider the example where most people search for movie reviews to decide whether or not they should watch that movie. In such a case would you believe a random person's view or trust a renowned film critic that has years of experience in the movie industry? Majority of the people will opt for the film critic as he will consider all the aspects of the movie and make a judgement.
Another reason because of which I disagree with the statement is one where you place a doctor in place of an engineer when constructing a dam. The doctor's inputs will be of no use as he/she is not aware of the process behind the construction and what all materials are required for it. In such a scenario, only expert opinion matters.
Nonetheless, there are certain fields where critical judgement of the work from someone who is not an expert should be not discredited. Progress can be made in these fields when you hear the viewpoints from several people and also understand their perspective as a whole. An example would be politics where, even though the politicians are experts in the field, listening to the demands and requirements of the citizens will do no harm. Their inputs will be valuable as it will help the politicians understand where they are lacking and what improvements can be made in order to benefit the society.
The area of art is also one in which someone can give their judgement on a certain art piece. Many people, even though they are not from this field, do have an artistic side and have that creativity that help in understanding art form in order to make a judgement.
In sum, critical judgements from an expert or not has value depending on the field for which it is being made. In some cases it can prove to be beneficial and in some that much.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- "In many countries it is now possible to turn on the television and view government at work.Watching these proceedings can help people understand the issues that affect their lives. Themore kinds of government proceedings---trials, debates, meetings, 50
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times morechronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent ofAsia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per day 49
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ople search for movie reviews to decide whether or not they should watch that movie. In such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'input'.
Suggestion: input
...er when constructing a dam. The doctors inputs will be of no use as he/she is not awar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nonetheless, so, well, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59842519685 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49230807372 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469816272966 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1828774047 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326796170575 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115256786974 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157486767807 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192308940165 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150080919135 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.