Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Do critical judgement only value when they are provide by the experts in their fields? The author thinks so and I tend to agree with the author because only the experts in their respective field can analyze the situation and can create a meaningful judgement. However, there may be several cases where the judgement from other group of people may equally be of importance.
Firstly, critical judgement is the process of analyzing the the information on basis of several knowledge and common sense. These judgments are a valuable source for the improvement in any field. These judgement help to critically acclaim certain data and information. These work can efficiently be carried out by the people who have a certain level of expertise in their field. Let us consider a example of the critical judgment about the novels can only be carried out by the expert in the field of literature as he can analyze the several parts logically. If the same novel is judged by a sports journalist then the judgement will be of no use as he lacks certain knowledge in the filed of literature. Many people may argue that this type of judgement can be carried out by the amateurs as they have new ideas in their filed and are revolutionary. Regarding such claims, which seems to be true in first glance but in the overall analysis this would be seriously faulty.
Secondly, Critical judgement itself is a difficult work and not in the range of every people. For carrying out such judgement, one has to reach a certain height in the respective fields. In the field of science and technology critical judgement are carried out by veteran professors and experienced personals in the research works. Similarly, experts in the field of business can properly judge the decisions made in the business field. There has nothing to do for the professor of physics alone with the business nor the professor of economics alone with the Science and technology. Hence we should always be aware with the fact that who is carrying out the critical judgement.
However, there may be several cases where people other than the experts also provide valid and logical critical judgement. We should never neglect these judgement. We should take such judgement as positive remarks. Though this type of judgement are very difficult to find these also have to be considered to a certain limit.
In final analysis, we conclude that critical judgement have a high value when they are carried out by the experts in the field and such judgement should be taken seriously in order to move forward in our field. Though there are few cases where the judgment made by non experts can also be beneficial hence, we should also take this things in consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...ical judgement only value when they are provide by the experts in their fields? The aut...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay equally be of importance. Firstly, critical judgement is the process of ana...
^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...l judgement is the process of analyzing the the information on basis of several knowled...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...l judgement is the process of analyzing the the information on basis of several knowled...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some knowledge'.
Suggestion: some knowledge
...alyzing the the information on basis of several knowledge and common sense. These judgments are a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this judgement' or 'These judgements'?
Suggestion: This judgement; These judgements
...ource for the improvement in any field. These judgement help to critically acclaim certain data...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y acclaim certain data and information. These work can efficiently be carried out by ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pertise in their field. Let us consider a example of the critical judgment about ...
^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...cally. If the same novel is judged by a sports journalist then the judgement will be ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ports journalist then the judgement will be of no use as he lacks certain knowled...
^^
Line 3, column 976, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nalysis this would be seriously faulty. Secondly, Critical judgement itself is a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re carried out by veteran professors and experienced personals in the research wo...
^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with the business nor the professor of economics alone with the Science and tec...
^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... alone with the Science and technology. Hence we should always be aware with the fact...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this judgement' or 'these judgements'?
Suggestion: this judgement; these judgements
...ical judgement. We should never neglect these judgement. We should take such judgement as posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ake such judgement as positive remarks. Though this type of judgement are very difficu...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e beneficial hence, we should also take this things in consideration.
^^^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also take this things in consideration.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88552915767 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62242872567 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429805615551 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2560331399 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.347826087 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1304347826 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 7.80617977528 231% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192892988213 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715785515293 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072470842682 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127817952574 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491057340038 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.