Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
According to the author's assertion, Judgements are useful if they are only given by the expertise of that field. In so far, i agree with this assertion due to the fact that seniors may have faced that particular problem and it's useful to be aware if any hazardous circumstances arise. On the other half, the novice seems to have judgmental error while facing the challenges. In those terms, those novice decisions may seem to be fickle.
Firstly, Let's have a prominnet example of landing the airbus on the Hudson river. When captainn Chesley "Sully" Sullenburger and first officer Skiles were boarding a plane to fly from Laguardia to Charlotte Douglas Internation airport, they were struck by the birds. On that particular case, Sully was very aware of the situation that the landing the plane to Lagaurdia or at the nearest airport Teterboro would not be made. So, despite that critical situation he backed up his experience and made resolute in this plan to land on the Hudson river. According to simulation, which was later done, if he had thought to land on either of the airport, the plane couldn't have made it. On this case, his instincts absolutely gave passengers, air hostesses and pilots to live once again. Hence, despite the continous suggestion from the view tower to land on the airports, Sully, with his experiences and skills landed the plane safely on the frigid Hudson river.
However, when it comes to the controversy of Henry Ford receiving the nazi's respected medal that is the medal of golden cross of Eagle, the dilettante seems to have failed. Henry Ford is named as the major person who revolutionized the cars production. He had adapted mass production techniques that proved to be the best method in revolutionizing the industries. Despite this fact, he was involved in political activities which consequently didn't favour him. And during that time, world war II was on the the culmination. At that time he received the Golden cross medal, the nazi regime's most honourable medal to the tourist. And he published anti-semitic writings on the newspapers calling it as The international jew. Despite of not being an expertise in these sorts of field, he made himself the controversial person.
To sum up, Like in the case of sully, experts decision are always the valuable one when one is forced to choose between life and death. On the other part, Henry ford suffered when he made support to the nazis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
According to the authors assertion, Judgements are useful if the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the expertise of that field. In so far, i agree with this assertion due to the fa...
^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...and on either of the airport, the plane couldnt have made it. On this case, his instinc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...political activities which consequently didnt favour him. And during that time, world...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...d during that time, world war II was on the the culmination. At that time he received t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...d during that time, world war II was on the the culmination. At that time he received t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94174757282 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75225166818 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558252427184 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3020576346 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9523809524 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835662511053 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231772217603 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354047287737 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460060146809 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244530222098 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.