Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
In order to consider a critical judgement of work in any field useful, it must be ensured that the judgement has come from a person who is an expert in that field.
Judgment of a work can be done without having any knowledge about the particular field; it does not required to be an expert before giving judgment. However, before considering a judgment an useful one it must be ensured that the person who is giving it is an expert and knows everything about the subject, because judgement from non expert may involve emotion and may be useless. Judgment from non-expert may be useless for numerous factors. Primarily, the person who is judging may not know the full thing about the work he is judging and his judgment may valid upto certain limit and beyond that it becomes useless. For example, when a novel is published many fans, critics, journalist provide their critical judgment about the work. But judgment from a fan is not equally useful as the judgment from a famous novelist who knows details about novels. For fan the facts which they want if they are present in a novel may be enough to give positive judgment on the novel. However, it may happen that as a novel the work may be not thorough and lacks potentiality to becoming a great novel and only the expert in writing can find those flaws.
In the field of civil engineering a judgment from a professor is not equally useful as the judgment from a lay person. For example, in order to remove traffic jam from a city lay people provides their judgment and most of the times their judgments differs from one another because every one analyze the problem from his perspective. However, it is the expert transportation engineer who provides the actual solution and his critical judgment on the problem includes the solution of traffic jam. He analyze the whole system theoretically and then create simulation of the problem and after much deliberation he expresses his decision. So, in no way his judgment is comparable to the judgment of a lay person.
Similarly, in the field of Cricket, fans can provide their judgment about the playing eleven of their country's team but it is ultimately the coach and the captain who make the final decision because they know the strong and weak points of each and every player of the team than a normal fan does. Even, most of the times the judgement of the fans involve emotion and no decision can be made without cerebral analysis.
When a scientific new theory is created a seminar is arranged in where the expert of that field attend; it is not those people barely knows anything about science. The pros and cons of the theory the application of the theory can be judged only after knowing about that field otherwise not.
However, when a mobile phone company introduces a new model of their phone in market the users express their judgment on the mobile phone. For example, for a photo lover person the camera quality is the prime factor while a game lover person primarily looks into the configuration of the mobile phone. So, in no way their judgment on the phone is compatible but mobile company may have to consider those reviews as their business depends on the users not the experts on mobile phones. But even then the judgement from expert should be taken into consideration for the future.
Judgment from the lay person is not so useful as the expert ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... However, before considering a judgment an useful one it must be ensured that the ...
^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'analyzes'.
Suggestion: analyzes
...ncludes the solution of traffic jam. He analyze the whole system theoretically and then...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2791.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7065767285 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46316360371 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39629005059 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0369917631 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.347826087 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7826086957 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296687828105 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106807962241 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940862647637 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173981373588 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119151426675 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.