Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The issue of whether the educational institute should affect student's decision of pursuing a field of study. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses. I believe, pursuing a field of study is an individual's decision and should not be influenced by anyone. Moreover, one tends to favor their field of interest as they have more knowledge of their respective fields.
Who better than the person itself has a better understanding of its interest area. Therefore, the decision to purse a particular field, subject or discipline should be made by the student itself without any intervention. Moreover, poeple change with time, a person who might not be good in academics in its early stage could outperform in the later stage. For instance, Einstein was not a prodigy in his childhood but still turned out to be as one of the eminent physicist of all time.
In addition to this, if the onus of choosing field of study is on educational instituions then there are good chances that the decision is affected. Generally, people favor their field of interest as they have spend a fair bit of time with that subject. Furthermore, one thing that has worked for someone might not be as benefical for others. For example, suggesting arts for a student who is weak in mathematics might work wonders for the student but for others it's could be disaster as they just needed an extra effort to achieve their goal rather than eliminating it all together.
Moreover, I believe educational institutions provide tools and infrastructure to students to achieve their goals in life. Rather than deviating them from their objective, they should asist them to achieve it by honing their skills and working on their weak area.
In conclusion, educational institutions should not dissuade students from pursuing their field of study as this decision should be dependent on the student's field of interest. Also, this way the decision is free of any prejudice, and inclination of other's field of study
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nowledge of their respective fields. Who better than the person itself has a bet...
^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...dition to this, if the onus of choosing field of study is on educational instituions ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...or their field of interest as they have spend a fair bit of time with that subject. F...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... wonders for the student but for others its could be disaster as they just needed a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01812688822 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78737869973 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498489425982 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9031621718 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261548685046 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964821290215 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993299931646 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171126095535 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104959016648 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.