Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
In today’s competitive world, roles of educational institutions on urging students to follow their path towards where they can get most successful career has been of immense importance. I generally agree with the writer that students should be guided to follow the field of study at which they are likely to succeed in; however, the author of the given statement fails to recognize the ramification of dissuading someone to go into a different field from one at which he/she seems unlikely to succeed.
Firstly, motivating someone to pursue their study in the field they are likely to succeed can have benign effect into a student’s life. Every students will give more attention to the subjects that they like the most as a result they ended up being experts of their field and which will help them securing good jobs in the future. For example, if someone is good at science but the course design consists a lot of literature then we have to think of replacing literature course by another science related course so that student can learn more about the subjects of his interest adding to his understanding of the subject matters.
Secondly, in the early days, students are unable to recognize their forte, if we do not recognize the students’ interest and we allow them to go on the field that they are unlikely to succeed, eventually they will be incapable of producing desire effect in the field of study that they are pursuing, as a result, theirs years of investment waste in vain. So, it is incumbent upon Educational institutions to guide student according to their wish.
Moreover, showing students their correct path in early days can help students not only uplift their career, but also augment their confidence. if students get opportunity to delve into the field that interest them the most, they can make tremendous contribution to the field they are pursuing which lead them to series of success uplifting their self-esteem and confidence. By way of example, the greatest football star Lionel Messi would not have been playing football if he was not guided properly in his early age. Probably, he might be working as a moderate army officer or a high school teacher by restraining his interest.
Admittedly, one may argue that some people are undecided about their ability until late, in such scenario it would be ill-advised to persuade student into taking their course in the field beyond their incapability, as an example, even Einstein was slow in mathematics and physics in his school days but later he became the greatest scientist. If someone dissuaded him into changing his field of study, we are very unlikely to have an outstanding scientist. Even though the claimed I have just made deserves some credits, in broad respect such scenarios are exceptional and not worthy of attention.
In conclusion, except few exception, it would be wise to dissuade students not to pursue field of study in which they are unlikely to perform well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to secure' or 'secure'.
Suggestion: to secure; secure
...of their field and which will help them securing good jobs in the future. For example, i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...eer, but also augment their confidence. if students get opportunity to delve into ...
^^
Line 11, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun exception seems to be countable; consider using: 'few exceptions'.
Suggestion: few exceptions
... of attention. In conclusion, except few exception, it would be wise to dissuade students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2492.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00401606426 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70919777511 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491967871486 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9282207086 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.133333333 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391022274896 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143987434282 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109434491001 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238516048126 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938209233142 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.