Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions are called “alma maters” as they are considered as our generous mother. Why is so? It is said so because these institutions mould our lives in a way only a mother can. Being our second homes, they help us develop the road leading to the destination, the goal of our life. It can make us successful magnates or ruin us by making us live a life of a malefactor. Such is the influence and power of our educational institutes on our lives. In this case, dissuading students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed, may exacerbate a student’s future.
Success is not an accident, but a step-by-step process. Every successful man was once a tyro. A student’s skills can be analyzed and corresponding fields of study can be suggested by the educational institutes but his interests cannot be extracted from this analysis. Chetan Bhagat, a very successful and famous writer, pursued engineering from the top institutions and topped all of his examinations, but eventually turned to write, where his interests lay.
When a student is dissuaded from studying in a field, he or she is interested in, it may lead to mental pressure and self-denial. Surveys indicate that 30% suicidal and depression cases in India and due to students, not pursuing their interests, rather being forced to study in the “successful” fields. This may reduce the overall development of a country.
It can be agreed that a student may have a higher success rate, when takes the road frequently traveled, but every student is compelled to take this road, the world shall be a boring place, with no singers, no cricketers, and no actors. If Sachin Tendulkar would have been discouraged and forced to take up engineering or if Leonardo DiCaprio would have been forced to become a chartered accountant, the world would have never seen these personalities rise up and showcase their talents.
Educational institutions are responsible for providing knowledge for all fields. They may warn students on how difficult it is to go down the path on a field they are unlikely to succeed in, but they should also teach them hard work, passion and struggle required and encourage them in every way possible. A person shall write his own future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...ers, and no actors. If Sachin Tendulkar would have been discouraged and forced to take up engin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... up engineering or if Leonardo DiCaprio would have been forced to become a chartered accountant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03684210526 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10769752928 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7371553878 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.736842105 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57894736842 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230828903754 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628566049551 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076555578146 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11560847518 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381562611781 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.