Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational Institutions are the doorsteps of adulthood for the students. It plays a crucial role in grooming and preparing students to get ready for their future.Though the given claim seems to be effective and good for students but it is butressed on many assumptions. Moreover the statement seems very generalized for a bigger and significant issue. In such issues, case by case analysis would be the best way to address.
Firstly, It is correct that Edcucational Institution can help student to decide the correct field of study in which they have better chances of success. But that depends on the credibility and expertise of institutions in predicting case by case. If the Educational Institution has enough experience and correct consultants who can have insight of historical data and future market trends then they can guide student in deciding their specialization or field of interest. On the other had if the institution is naive in the field then it might not be able to guide students effectively.
Secondly, even with all prediction,it can not be 100% correct for all cases. It might be true that the student has developed the interest after selecting the field of the study and then do tremendously well. On the same case the school might have dissuaded to select different field. Apart from the school recommendation there should be some flexibility to the student to try and test their capability and interest for both the fields: one which is recommended by school and the other is self decided.
On contrary, it might be also argued that since students have very narrowed vision and limited knowledge about any field and practically it is impossible for any student to gather relevent information about all the fields availble, hence, Schools or instituation always is superior in deciding good field for the students. Although this is definitely true, but in todays advance age students are exposed to all sorts of required information by internet. Usually most of the students do their research, get information from communities and also compare different fields of study for selecting.
So, based on the context described above we can say that Educational institution can definitely add values in deciding the correct field for the student. But it cannot be generalized and in some case could lead to an adverse impact for student's career. Schools should give the consulting recommendation but students should be allowed to choose their field of interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
... students to get ready for their future.Though the given claim seems to be effective a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ut it is butressed on many assumptions. Moreover the statement seems very generalized fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...y. Secondly, even with all prediction,it can not be 100% correct for all cases. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...d be some flexibility to the student to try and test their capability and interest for ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15308641975 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92658116328 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483950617284 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9249329116 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.944444444 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182110049087 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650286384005 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479069370626 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110311795755 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471282362643 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.