Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In current time where student wants to lead their life basis on money earn by knowledge gained in Educational institutions. This kind of institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
If institution should not encourage their students to choose proper fields of study then it create a turbulence in life of students as this leads to low money paying job. Some people might think that choosing a field according to your interest is best choice though sometimes it leads to chaos as person lose interest over the time but person never lose knowledge which help him to survive in this world. By having a good lucrative career person can spend more money on health related things, for their children’s education and of course on holiday too. A person with this kind of career might compromise some of his happiness over family’s safety. If we see at most of middle class working persons then they are great example of this kind of thing. They hate their jobs but loves amount of salary and because of this they can pay EMI and bills. Without lucrative career person can brag about how he is burden free or happy but may be not financial secure.
Secondly, more person in lucrative career is good for country as individual gain. If more people are in lucrative careers then this work possess some essential skill which provide some excellent service which leads overall progress of people. If we think about example of astronomers then by having them country can make progress in astrophysics. Having more doctors leads to good health ratio in country. Having more skilful engineer leads development in different aspects of technology. So, by encouraging more students into lucrative branch decides country’s future. So, this is responsibility of Educational Institution to provide proper guidance about this point.
Some may argue that because of this more of the job has interest in other field and working in some other field. As this type of people does not bring much productivity in their work and works as robot in any company in any aspect of career. Though, By having good career they can revive their hobbies from ground and spend money for developing or continuing their work in interested area.
A person with lucrative career is always good for country as well as individual because this leads to better life compare to other choice in most cases. So, As responsible Educational Institution has to actively encourage students to select branch with lucrative careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...o choose proper fields of study then it create a turbulence in life of students as thi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...sing a field according to your interest is best choice though sometimes it leads to cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is good for country as individual gain. If more people are in lucrative careers th...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which leads overall progress of people. If we think about example of astronomers t...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... guidance about this point. Some may argue that because of this more of the job ha...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... compare to other choice in most cases. So, As responsible Educational Institution has...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, kind of, of course, as well as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05152224824 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61770343296 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473067915691 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1221333631 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238846615551 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880348593568 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110360075099 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179234265059 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990434097628 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.