Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker recommends that educational institutions such as universities,colleges etc should encourage the student to pursue the subject which are likely to produce fruitful careers. I agree with the recommendation with the statement in so far that the lucrative career pitched by the institution should match with the passion, desire and interest of the prospective student.
Educational institution usually know more about the careers prospect than the student of that institution because the organization system of the education system consists of expert professors, guidance counsellors, alumni network etc who are more than qualified to identify the lucrative careers for the students. It is the job of institution to inform student about the different career opportunities of different field, they should generally encourage the student to take the fruitful field of study with lucrative careers. If the student is confused about taking majors then it is institution responsibility to encourage them to take the major which produce more lucrative career. By no means should the institution should encourage student to take major in field where the student is not interested in. A student who is good at art should be encouraged to to take economics just because economics majors are earning more.
A fruitful career is good for everyone including the student and educational institution. Student will be doing good in his professional life, while educational institution make claim the professional with splendid career as an alumni of the institution. It is win win situation for for the both parties.
But, a fruitful career can be regarded as subjective. A person can find happiness in doing something he enjoys and likes rather than earning money. If a student takes a major based on solely the lucrative career then, it will be deleterious for the student. So, the institution should be first to act on these situation, can distill only the student who are match for the lucrative careers. And the world is ever changing, one decade hot and lucrative job will be other decade dead end jobs. To choose one's major based entirely on prospect of lucrative job is not prudent.
To sum up, it will not be sagacious to encourage every student to pursue the lucrative career with out studying the background, desire and passion of the student and the educational institution should only encourage the selective student to pursue the field of study whose ambition, passion matches with the that "lucrative" career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , colleges
...tional institutions such as universities,colleges etc should encourage the student to pur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... field of study with lucrative careers. If the student is confused about taking ma...
^^
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...who is good at art should be encouraged to to take economics just because economics m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an alumnus' or simply 'alumni'?
Suggestion: an alumnus; alumni
...he professional with splendid career as an alumni of the institution. It is win win situa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
... as an alumni of the institution. It is win win situation for for the both parties. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...he institution. It is win win situation for for the both parties. But, a fruitful c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...e institution should be first to act on these situation, can distill only the student who are m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...situation, can distill only the student who are match for the lucrative careers. And th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... student to pursue the lucrative career with out studying the background, desire and pas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the that 'lucrative' career.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.317617866 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08607659515 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429280397022 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6818066526 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.058823529 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318740788097 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117281440182 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692602273382 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199199708617 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494084776391 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.