Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Today’s students are country’s future. They will determine if the country will progress and be ahead in the race of developing nations, or they lose the race. A country will fail to create efficient professionals, if the citizens/students pursue fields of study/careers in which they’re likely to fail. I agree with the idea of institutions dissuading students from choosing a career path and pursuing such fields in which there is nothing but darkness, which is derived from the given three reasons.
Firstly, choice in field of study decides what profession student will enter into. If they fail to gain perfection in their field, it would imply that they’re not the best candidate for the profession. In today’s competitive world, the number of suitable candidates are higher in ratio when compared with the number of open positions and opportunities. If John is interested in nothing but Golf, but tries to apply for a position of banker on the Wall Street, his failure is predictable. If this gap between positions and candidates remains as it is, for a professional with limited strength and proficiency, it becomes harder to survive.
Secondly, there exists a vicious cycle between the student’s interest, and their performance in study. Both gradually descend, and a time might come when the student will prefer to quit. The tendency to fail in one’s choice of study, makes the student lesser interested in it, which in-turn reduces their academic performance and the cycle repeats. When this cycle continues for a prolonged period, the situation will fall apart and the student is highly unlikely to gain anything from the course.
Lastly, students will turn into working professionals who will strengthen the backbone of the country’s economy. When an individual fails to achieve big goals, they simply contribute to the pile of mediocre individuals. This is something the educational institutes must look forward to. One of the main aims of these educational institutes is to create bright and talented students, who go out in the world and bring betterment to the society. Take Sarah for example, if Sara wants to pursue a career in Humanities, and transform the world into a better place for people of all the background, for nature, for everything, she can do it. But this will happen only in an ideal world. In our real and practical world, there exists numerous complexities which Sarah as an individual cannot resolve herself. If they (students) fail to succeed, they’re not bringing any good to the table.
In conclusion, an Institute must push students into field of study in which they’ve a bright career path. One might argue that student’s should pursue courses in which their interests lie, and interests is what makes them happy. But in this world, happiness doesn’t fetch you bread and shelter. Only money can get you those things, and money can be earned effectively when one chooses a career in which there is no failure. So one should only pursue field of subjects in which they’ll not fail.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17764471058 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96565950074 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518962075848 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9501353391 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2692307692 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57692307692 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265077242151 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764303253625 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055958792532 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156384051127 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560954961713 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.