Essay topic 27: The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scientific research and development like high tech electric devices and medical equipment as well as treatment of diseases have benefited the society in various areas of technology and medicine. Some argue that scientific experiment somewhat requires to be restricted. After weighing the evidences, it is obvious that the authority must constrict scientific research and development to some extent.
To begin with, today’s world is based on the scientific technology and development. Had the relevant experiment been done, we would not have had the existing progress in our life. To illustrate this, let us consider the example of invention and development of the computer the current smart phones and iPads have been the outcomes of doing multitude researches and experts that has facilitated our life so that we connect people who are a whole world apart. In addition, many diseases are cured these days because numerous experiments and researches have been conducted to enable the researchers to find out new medications. Thus, all these advances are rooted in the prior researches in such areas.
In addition, some developments are interconnected like computer and internet. If the authority limits the research in IT areas, there will not be any further development in the future while it is predicated that the future generations’ life would absolutely be controlled by computer like robots via internet. Thus, setting limits on such advancement would be detrimental for the future generations.
In contrast, it is argued that giving through freedom on the scientific experiment will lead to inparable consequences. For instance, development of nuclear power has made some countries powerful. If an unrest circumstance happens internationally among some countries like Russia and Iran, the atomic war will probably occur. Therefore, it is integral to restrict scientific research and experiments in this area. Another example could be the development of some chemical materials derived from petroleum. Some countries produce these chemical products which pollute not only the air but also the environment which ultimately endangers many people’s life and wildlife.
Moreover, some experimental research in medication could be detrimental while it saves people’s life; it takes life out of people. For instance, chemists and pharmacists work on formulation of medicines. Some of the medicines are categorized as hazard or narcotic which must be consumed under the official permits of the relevant organizations. Otherwise, they would be easily accessible to everyone which would generally threaten the health of the society. Also, if there wouldn’t be any restrictions on the research in the areas of new formulations and medications, some scientists might have insane ideas and make fatal drugs which result in unpredictable consequences. Furthermore, genetics experiments and research could lead to catastrophic consequences if they conducted illegally. Some criminals may use such experiments to disturb the crime scene investigation.
In conclusion, the scientific research and experiment must be somewhat supervised and restricted by the authority to avoid any disastrous outcomes like atomic war and emergence of new fatal drugs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 210, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...cists work on formulation of medicines. Some of the medicines are categorized as hazard or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2801.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71632653061 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20990566487 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512244897959 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0678731539 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.04 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0560475842841 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184437779217 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216836546496 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0306693421969 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206536619237 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.