government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Government is group of people with authority to govern a country or state. It is government’s primary duty to focus on problems of country as well as work for its solution. Governments should focus on solving the present problems but it is also important to solve anticipated problems of the future which may put holocaust effect on country. I am totally agreeing with the statement due to some reasons lets discuss about them.
Firstly, when I take job in an organization as a teacher then I focuses on present problems but my action should be consider the future anticipated problems in student’s behaviors. As well as to solve present problem government takes some actions and it may be plausible due to these actions some problems could be rise in future. On the important place the government cannot look only on one side of the coin. If the government slovenly deal with the anticipated problem and earthquake distracted the land than the country face big loss and it take too much time. Today’s government expends lots of fund on weather forecast to get prior information of climatic change which is important for a country.
Secondly, sometimes government has to consider future consequences of present problems. For example, In India government decided to join two or more rivers to fulfill demand of water throughout the state. The Narmada River connected with Kshipra River to supply sufficient water in Madhya Pradesh state, that time government firstly analysis the future difficulties due to solution of present problem of lack of water in some areas. So the government should focus on both present as well as future problems.
Thirdly, generally government focus on current problems such as poverty, education, unemployment, nutrition and many more which are important, but what about defense, global warming, climatic disaster, economic fall etc. Government has to be aware about the unwanted misfortunes and these should not be ignored. However it is true sometime people feel that government is wasting their time on future which is not correct. Yes it is wrong to ignore present problems and totally focus on future. The government should be very vigilant and multitasking to handle all tasks effectively.
Finally, the government should focus on solving present problems but it should be vigilant for anticipated problems of the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium—substances essential for building and maintaining bones. Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis, a disease that is linked to both environmental 63
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. Write a response in which took you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the state 75
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined within a month. T 55
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of s 30
- The following appeared in a health magazine."The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... may put holocaust effect on country. I am totally agreeing with the statement due to some reasons ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'focus'
Suggestion: focus
... in an organization as a teacher then I focuses on present problems but my action shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...resent problems but my action should be consider the future anticipated problems in stud...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ese actions some problems could be rise in future. On the important place the government ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...d than the country face big loss and it take too much time. Today's government ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...government should focus on both present as well as future problems. Thirdly, generally ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rtunes and these should not be ignored. However it is true sometime people feel that go...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22976501305 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89196522046 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490861618799 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7131897535 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.421052632 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409957941896 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141861893838 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132958208916 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300724259059 0.150359130593 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140048609036 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.