Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Allocating public finance wisely is at paramount of national administration; however tax the authority collects, if it is spendthrift then the country will soon experience deteriorating economy. Since cities have most of the state’s population and cultural aspects, governments are often tempted to distribute lots of money for metropolitan areas. However, such spendings are not always appropriate though there are plenty of cases where cities deserve financial supports from government.
The leader of a country should think over the fundamental rule of budget allocation: if there is money, there should be a reason. In that sense, the reason suggested in the prompt often makes sense. Cities are where a nations characteristics are made, especially when it comes to the case of spiritual traditions. For example, we easily recall that the main spiritual traditions of the United States are frontierism and entrepreneurship. Both spirits were created and started to spread from the biggest cities in the states: New York, Seattle, Chicago, and etc. Those cities boasted citizens who courageously jump into unknown humongous businesses such as train rails, automobiles, and more recently, internet technologies. It is also pointed out that the federal government took an important role in growths of those cities and their spirits. When financial crisis mercilessly threatened those cities in 1929 and 2008, it was the federal government which bailed out them and saved the virtue of the country. As we can see from this historical fact, the government should be a guardian of city economically so that they can thrive and develop the national traditions.
However, it should be noted that it is not always the case that cities dominate local areas in generating national traditions. We also see potentials of rural areas as remarkable as those in cities. Hollywood, once only small, arid town producing low-quality crops such as corn and wheat, is now one of the biggest factory for movie industry. Such amazing would have never been able to grown that far if the government ignored the potentials and enthusiasm for acting of people having living there. Cities attracts talented people, capitals which are supposed to foster the birth of new cultures, and consumers indispensable for large-scale cultural traditions.
Meanwhile, leaders of the government should consider which value they have to put a higher priority. If cultural aspects they would like to give the priority, they must consider the potentials of rural areas and current marginal benefits cities generate from additional investment, as discussed above. However, cultural growth is not the only goal for the government; it must also consider improvements in political, economic, or social facet of the country. Which value would get the highest preference from the governor is heavily depend on, at least under democratic systems, the choice of people expressed in elections. Therefore, the answer for the prompt might vary even severely with people whose virtues and backgrounds are diverse.
Yes, it is difficult for the leader of the country to decide which area should get how much budget; any decision he makes would cause bitter complaints from those who do not get more money. Therefore, it is important for him to establish clear standards for budget managing so that he can support the nations cultural, political, and economic growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...the states: New York, Seattle, Chicago, and etc. Those cities boasted citizens who coura...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 535, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...preference from the governor is heavily depend on, at least under democratic systems, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2895.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37105751391 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86510107724 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547309833024 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2837130674 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.625 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4583333333 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214335895163 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589363048101 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518542221137 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115524526124 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593786666919 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.