Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
There are no lack of stories of scientists bringing the world to the edge of destruction with their unregulated researches, accidental or intentional, staring with the archetype, Frankenstein. All those stories have left the world is afraid of what scientists may create in their laboratories if their research efforts are not closely watched. However, I believe there should be few regulations placed on scientific researches, though they do need to be regulated.
Despite all the horrifying stories about the mad scientists, researches are actually not that dangerous. Artists tend to portray scientists as having no regards for things other than their own investigations because that is the easiest to create a good story, instead of because that is the way most researchers are. In fact, most, if not all scientists have reasonable moral standards, and will not continue on with their research if they are concerned with the possible disaster their research will bring. Even if one of the researcher overlooked or intentionally neglected the impending danger, his or her colleagues will be able to remind or stop the researcher, as most researches today involve groups of scientist instead of individuals. Considering these facts, the academia actually have a self-regulating system that will help prevent malicious researches from happening, thus researches are not as dangerous as some populations may think.
In addition, strict government regulations placed on certain research fields for security and morality concerns are actually impeding useful researches. One example is the restrictions placed on stem cell researches. In fear of labs cloning human and thus brings about identity problems and morality problems, the government stricter controlled stem cell researches. Though this is done with good intend, the regulations, as a side effect, also slow down the researches on the use of stem cell for medical purpose, such as the cultivation of organs from stem cells. Consequently, the technologies that could have saved thousands of people are not going to be available for sometime because of the regulation. As this example has shown, regulations intended to avoid disasters can some times have detrimental side effects, as they will slow down the beneficial researches as well as the harmful ones.
Granted, regulations are still needed despite their many drawbacks. They exists not only to detect and avoid the potentially harmful researches from happening, but also to assure people. The public can sleep better at night knowing there won’t be monsters or mass-destructive weapons coming out of the laboratories. Regulations are need, but they shouldn’t be so strict as to make any beneficial researches impossible.
In conclusion, I think there should be few restrictions placed on scientific researches as doing will slow down beneficial researches as well malicious one and that the science community do have certain management system themselves. However, research should still be regulated, not only to prevent disasters, but also to assure the public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rankenstein. All those stories have left the world is afraid of what scientists m...
^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
...eded despite their many drawbacks. They exists not only to detect and avoid the potent...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233644859813 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.171962616822 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0859813084112 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0672897196262 0.0497285424764 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0317757009346 0.0444667217837 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123364485981 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0504672897196 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.09276831699 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224299065421 0.030933414821 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00560747663551 0.0016655270985 337% => OK
Determiners: 0.0803738317757 0.0997080785238 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0261682242991 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00560747663551 0.0148568991511 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3096.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 477.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.49056603774 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412997903564 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.331236897275 0.280924506359 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.253668763103 0.200843997647 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190775681342 0.132149295362 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09276831699 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501048218029 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.0731002529 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.85 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1453886215 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.8 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.95 0.674092028746 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 56.9736897275 51.4728631049 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.50344827586 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259947182158 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.089022726925 0.123202303941 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0587525784402 0.077325440228 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.509394132652 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117527496753 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107351960207 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435536570515 0.0892212321368 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.369437552777 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0722557786939 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183258009516 0.275328986314 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309580728118 0.0653680567796 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.