Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
There is only one thing that is making our lives better day by day, and that is attributed to scientific breakthroughs and developments. It has changed people’s lives for the better and is a valuable asset to a country. Indeed, such development and research should have the full support of the government with minimal encumbrance imposed on its growth.
That scientific progress and development ensure the progress of a country, is beyond reproach. A country is able to have an edge over its competitors by making sure that it is more innovative and scientifically more advanced. One of the cardinal duties of the government of any country is to ensure the security of its citizens. While countries vie for power and hegemony over others, they have to make sure that their military gear and weapons are the most advanced and redoubtable. By supporting scientific research in this area, a nation would be at a massive advantage over the others. Today we hear about the new scientific research and breakthroughs in making nuclear weapons. Countries developing and possessing such ammunitions are no doubt guaranteeing its citizens a safer place to live. Hence, to strengthen the security of any country, it is incumbent upon the government to invest in the scientific research without any hesitation.
Not only does the military reap all the benefits from minimally restricted scientific developments, the citizens do too. Cancer, which is a deleterious disease and is ramifying at a precipitous rate in the world, needs to be researched more to find cures or alternative therapies that would benefit people tremendously. Carrying out research on such diseases is expensive as it requires specialized equipment, trained laboratory personnel, and a well-designed facility to carry out the studies. If restrictions like limited financial support and working space are imposed on such researches, mankind would not be benefitted and the sufferings would continue unabated. Hence, when it comes to the health of the citizens of a country, the government should impose the least restrictions on scientific innovations and developments that make the life of people better.
However, putting little or no restrictions on such developments can also put a country at risk. For ensuring the nuclear weapons are working efficiently, they need to be tested. Since such weapons have radioactive elements, they can pose a serious threat to the environment and also interfere with the health of the denizens. Hence, restrictions like circumscribing an area for testing purposes which is barren and without any human habitation should be imposed. Also, in carrying out medical researches, human subjects are used in the trials for testing the effects of a new medicine or procedure on them. Bioethical restrictions need to be enforced in such cases to ensure the safety of the subjects.
Nevertheless, the aforementioned restrictions are mostly paid heed to before planning out big scientific projects and developments and it is made sure that the advantages outnumber the disadvantages. Having ensured that, the scientific developments should then be carried out with the least restrictions as possible so that people cherish the benefits of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imal encumbrance imposed on its growth. That scientific progress and development...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires specialized" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'specializing' or 'to be specialized'.
Suggestion: specializing; to be specialized
...ch diseases is expensive as it requires specialized equipment, trained laboratory personnel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that people cherish the benefits of it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2736.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1589537267 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6416384148 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135905476046 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421195105973 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266727419438 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828958285557 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00370214528425 0.0667264976115 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.