The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the modern world with the high level of improving robots, computers, and other smart machines, the statement that human will always surpass the first ones is becoming a hot spot for people. The prompt states that machines are made as tools of mankind, hence machines will always be overshadowed by human minds. In my opinion, I disagree with this idea and argue that human mind will not stay superior to machines for two ways.
To begin, we need to consider about the rapid growth of technology these days. Each year machines are becoming smarter by improving their abilities and features. In the future, it will be possible that machines become smarter than people. This is because machine learning makes use of reinforcement learning that is a very primitive implementation of how humans understand and approach new concepts or challenges. As a recent event, Artificial Intelligence educated by machine learning has beaten humans at “highly intellectual” games for the human mind such as Go and chess. It was a huge event that clearly showed how AIs educate themselves and surpass the human’s intelligence. This example illustrates the possibility of reaching the point that machines will be smarter than human beings is high.
Further, even if we assume that machines never become smarter than humans because people will make a restriction in the level of development for machines, machines could still change our lives in a great manner. For example, in the past, we did not expect that human translators could be replaced by automatic-translation machines. In fact, the level of translation by machines is still far behind than that of professional humans. Nevertheless, translators are being regarded as one of the most replaceable occupations these days. Perhaps this may be due to the economic validity. Even though humans are better translator, automatic translation machines are cheaper and the quality of translation is not that bad. In this situation, people who were doing translation as a job are facing quite different job market condition these days. In other words, our living will be highly affected by machines and even there is a possibility that we have to change ourselves because of machines.
Of course, some may argue that people will be able to perfectly control machines, thus there is little possibility that we have to adjust our lives according to machines. Therefore, they may suggest that human minds will be never inferior to machines. However, if we consider our history that experienced similar situation two hundred years ago through the so-called Industrial Revolution and the Luddite movement, we cannot be sure we are always superior to machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great manner" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., machines could still change our lives in a great manner. For example, in the past, we did not e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in fact, of course, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21330275229 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9516085255 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3677840286 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.238095238 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267683808966 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941824023484 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705885165447 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188058271553 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886483476644 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.