The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Over the decades, humans have come up with lots of useful inventions and creations. Machines and artificial intelligence have made human lives easier and faster. However, these machinery are created by human, hence, cannot be considered superior than humans.
Machines have made human life faster and simpler. From communication to travelling, everything is much more convenient with the help of machine(s). It seems like human are getting heavily dependent on machines, however, the truth is the other way round. The machine, however advanced it may be, is always dependent on the human control and supervision for initiating or accomplishing any task. Let’s take a simple example of telephone. Human make use of telephone to make a call, it does not call anyone itself. Or say, human drive and operate an automobile for the purpose of transportation. Even the advanced automated cars, if left alone, could be perilous without human attention or supervision.
Though machines are more accurate and faster than human beings, yet cannot guarantee to produce a best decision in a particular situation. The best decision always incorporates rationality with emotions. Human brains are constantly experiencing, learning, understanding and growing intellectually as well as emotionally, whereas machine lacks emotional intelligence. Human can take cognitive decisions easily on their own, on the other hand mechanical mind of machinery need human(s) to feed them with a decision-making program to function that way.
Since the use of machines and artificial intelligence are so pervasive in our daily lives now, that it seems like humans are the servants of machine. On the contrary, machines, no matter how advanced, fast and accurate they may become will always need human intervention, control and supervision in their operations. Without human the machines are of no use. It is us, the humans, who make them useful by utilizing them in one way or the other. Our lives may become very difficult without machines but still it wouldn't be IMPOSSIBLE. From the stone-age era till this wireless era, it is human who develop and invent new tools (whether, stone tools, clay-moulded tools or iron or steel tools) and machines to make our work easier and lives luxurious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this machinery' or 'these machineries'?
Suggestion: this machinery; these machineries
...human lives easier and faster. However, these machinery are created by human, hence, cannot be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...n, hence, cannot be considered superior than humans. Machines have made human l...
^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...beings, yet cannot guarantee to produce a best decision in a particular situation...
^
Line 13, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...difficult without machines but still it wouldnt be IMPOSSIBLE. From the stone-age era t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34818941504 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95456394338 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571030640669 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0068515059 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4285714286 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403145911352 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118621431236 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710963044148 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250946328424 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209267695069 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.