If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Experience indeed plays a vital role in determining the quality of work. People with more experience tend to give efficient results as compared to freshers. The claim posits that experience should be given a priority while recruiting a candidate for any job. It seems appropriate to recruit based on experience. However, the claim does not provide a complete picture.
To begin with, the talent of any person determines his/her ability to work in any situation. If a person is talented then it is likely that he/she will tackle almost every problem. For example, consider a situation where two persons are sitting for a job interview. One person is having experience of 5 years and the other one is fresher. Now, it might be possible that the experienced person has done nothing in those 5 years and maybe was fired from previous jobs because of the quality of his/her work. Whereas the other one might study well in his/her college, and as a result, he/she have a tight hold in his/her field. If the firm had selected the experienced person then it will be deleterious for that company in the future. Thus, every experienced person may not have good knowledge and therefore, freshers should be given a chance to prove themselves.
Furthermore, depending only on the experience may not be beneficial for any organization. Some people may believe that experience is crucial for developing new ideas but there are many other factors, apart from the experience, which decides the effectiveness of any person. For instance, there are many skills that do not require experience to improve. One of such skills is analytical thinking. Everyone posses different types of thinking ability. A person who is studying in college may have good analytical skills than that a person who is having experience of 5 years in any field. This is because the interest of a person determines the ability to analyze a particular situation. The person with more experience may not have any kind of interest as compared to that of fresher. So, if any firm conducts an exam before selecting the candidate then it is more likely an apt decision as compared to select people only on the basis of experience.
It can be inferred that selecting the candidate based on job experience sounds beneficial but it will likely backfire if all the factors determining the job requirement are not considered. Thus, the only experience will not provide accurate information about the candidate
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s/her ability to work in any situation. If a person is talented then it is likely ...
^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...is/her college, and as a result, he/she have a tight hold in his/her field. If the f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 949, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people only on the basis of experience. It can be inferred that selecting the ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, apart from, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99756690998 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78964567719 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462287104623 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1863497762 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5833333333 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17824948606 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568174423001 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610396128628 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129997019344 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347033588601 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.