If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would note be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In today's era jobs requirements for recruiting employees are vague. The recruiters mostly consider what is the recruiter's qualification, work experience also matters a lot. The recruiters must select an candidate based on there pure abilities and skills and not how much did they worked in the past.
The applicants qualified for a job, should have good qualities and better learning abilities. The applicant with less experience but more skills should be given the preference than the one with more experience but less skills. The applicant with more skills can come up with new and original techniques with his skillsets. The less experience applicants maybe don't have techniques to deal with market but can surely have how to deal with his working style. Considering an applicant with more experience to be selected but then the applicant having no idea or less idea about the work which assigned will not only lose applicant's interests but also the profit of the company will be fickle.
Considering about work experience, the candidate should be selected on the type of position the applicant would be working. The more experience will not come in handy if the applicant does not have any experience about the field of job which will be assigned. The applicant with less experience but having experience in the same field which the job is assigned would probably do better than the one with more experience. If a more experience applicant got selected in a field which the applicant does not have any experience will less efficient, training would have to be arranged for such kind of applicant which lead the company to spend expenses on that, whereas a less experience which already having experience for the position of the job does not require any training, leading to a cost efficiency.
The applicant having more experience knows the outside world better, the trending facilities, what type of work did he came across with all these things will help the company to try different approach. The applicant can train other employees the new idea which will bolster the skills of other employees too.
The job should be given to the one with more skills and techniques and having experience in the same field the job is going to give position to.
The job selection should be based on a genuine and unbiased way. This leads to the growth of the company by not having any extra expenses.Therefore, the recruiters must select an candidate based on there pure abilities and skills and not how much did they worked in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'recruiters'' or 'recruiter's'?
Suggestion: recruiters'; recruiter's
... recruiters mostly consider what is the recruiters qualification, work experience also mat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tters a lot. The recruiters must select an candidate based on there pure abilities...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ow much did they worked in the past. The applicants qualified for a job, should ...
^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ualities and better learning abilities. The applicant with less experience but more...
^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun skills is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e than the one with more experience but less skills. The applicant with more skills ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e with more experience but less skills. The applicant with more skills can come up ...
^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...original techniques with his skillsets. The less experience applicants maybe dont h...
^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s. The less experience applicants maybe dont have techniques to deal with market but...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r the skills of other employees too. The job should be given to the one with mor...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he job is going to give position to. The job selection should be based on a genu...
^^^
Line 11, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ompany by not having any extra expenses.Therefore, the recruiters must select an candidat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 177, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s.Therefore, the recruiters must select an candidate based on there pure abilities...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247240618102 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.172185430464 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860927152318 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0507726269316 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0110375275938 0.0444667217837 25% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.0993377483444 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0573951434879 0.0406280797675 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68912020428 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0242825607064 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00220750551876 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.136865342163 0.0997080785238 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0441501103753 0.0249443105267 177% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0264900662252 0.0148568991511 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2546.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 427.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.962529274 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.313817330211 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.236533957845 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19906323185 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156908665105 0.132149295362 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68912020428 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.379391100703 0.48968727796 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.8044067479 55.4138127331 74% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 25.1176470588 23.380412469 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6693750539 59.4972553346 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.764705882 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 23.380412469 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.21349557522 230% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 48.7710428434 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.72641509434 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.550969328398 0.391690518653 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.208429270784 0.123202303941 169% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108024897605 0.077325440228 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.672154916867 0.547984918172 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.181634410279 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.270767969772 0.161403998019 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921204273704 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416160180832 0.385218514788 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.124356833853 0.0692045440612 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37861542107 0.275328986314 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873324836371 0.0653680567796 134% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.