If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
As the high education became accessible almost to everyone, modern labor market became overwhelmed with qualified people. An excessive supply certainly did not increase the demand for such number of workers and now many countries suffer from high unemployment rates, especially among young generation. Moreover, some countries have increased the retirement age and, thus, older and more experienced workers are still competing with younger ones for the job places. Today companies have lots of opportunities to choose who they want to hire and they often prefer experienced applicants for the job to the unexperienced ones, even if both have equal qualification. However, this is not always the best strategy.
One reason for companies to start hiring employees without work experience is that they might have professional vision free of stereotypes or that may occur during the long working or dogmas of an outdated high education programs because most likely workers with experience are the older generation and have finished their education long ago. For example, an experienced teachers at my school were less effective, for they used old methodology in explaining and denied the importance of gadgets in education, compared to young professionals who used all of the modern technological features, like Kahoot online-testing system for better check of students’ progress or Prezi program for presentations which is far more illustrative and convenient. The second reason is that almost always people without experience are young and very enthusiastic. They eager to learn, engage in self-development and work harder as they have no experience and need more practice. For instance, Shlumberger, an oil company in which every employee has to pass training, tries to hire students after they have finished universities because they can be trained much easier than older experienced workers, for they have got used to intensive learning and information processing at university.
On the other hand, there are many areas in which the more the experience the better. Quiet often nuances and peculiarities associated with particular job can be learnt only through the working process and companies want employees to be as effective as possible. Management, HR or PR techniques are best learnt through practice and of course firms would prefer experienced candidates, as they would probably bring more profit.
Overall, it can be said that experienced workers are not always the best ones. However, sometimes it is important for the firm to take it into account, depending on what type of job it offers to a candidate. Aforementioned examples shows that hiring should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'teacher'?
Suggestion: teacher
...n long ago. For example, an experienced teachers at my school were less effective, for t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ompared to young professionals who used all of the modern technological features, like Kah...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'Quiet'.
Suggestion: Often Quiet
...ich the more the experience the better. Quiet often nuances and peculiarities associated wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, as to, for example, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43838862559 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.029753142 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571090047393 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.0596214093 60.3974514979 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4375 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169189118449 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530651321814 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493292647662 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107271222723 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442066823706 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.