Laws should be flexible enough to enough to take into account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many laws are rarely ever ridged for a long period of time. Others are ephemeral and last even months at a time. Though they should all try to maintain order in society. It has been said that laws need to be flexible to account for special circumstances, times, and different places. I mostly agree with this statement for two reasons and disagree with it with one statement.
First, when considering laws it is important to decide circumstance. Certain circumstances should determine whether or not a particular law should apply. For example, consider the famous Heinz Dilemma when a man whose wife is dying of cancer finds a chemist with a cure. The chemist charges ten times the cost of production and the man cannot afford to pay. So, the man breaks in the chemist’s lab and steals the drug. The man should not be charged with a crime because higher moral reasoning suggests that a better of man such as the chemist should not charge so much for a drug. Thus, certain circumstances such as poverty should allow laws to be flexible since not all people share the same social standings.
Furthermore, today’s pressing and compelling events show how laws should be flexible in certain times. Specifically, the opiod crisis in America. People are dying from overdoses of life-running drugs because there are few alternatives to pain management. However, promising alternatives such as medical cannabis may be able to help others with minimal side effects and almost comparable potency as the opiod drug class. Sadly enough, people are still dying and struggling with opioid use since it is too difficult for researchers to get their hands on this substance since it is illegal. Unless the laws give them some wiggle room, a life-saving alternative would be available to save lives numbering in the millions over several years. Therefore, if laws are more flexible during times of this kind of crisis, safer alternatives will help save lives in places all over the world.
On the other hand, sometimes it is best that laws stay unmaleable. For reasons to do with morality and public trust, presidents and other political leaders should never lie no matter how ugly the truth may seem. This is in line with Kantian ethics which says: “you shall never lie”. To illustrate, if the president tries to gain secret and slanderous information about his opponent when law enforcement says that he should tell the truth, he should go ahead and do so. Laws such as this should apply when he is on live TV with a quarter of the population watching or when he is in a sealed off interogation room with the FBI. If any political leader lies, public trust in the government goes down. Laws that maintain integrity are crucial and should always be followed.
In conclusion, laws are important for the well-being of all people, however there are numerous extrodinary circumstances, times, and places which they must allow exceptions in order for that said well-being to be maintained. However, there are also laws which must be set and never violated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... laws are rarely ever ridged for a long period of time. Others are ephemeral and last even mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hemeral and last even months at a time. Though they should all try to maintain order i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... Certain circumstances should determine whether or not a particular law should apply. For exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95533980583 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71280552015 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539805825243 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3892553314 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1428571429 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3928571429 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03571428571 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272609308891 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665720725701 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592208807639 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155350214681 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511085860682 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.