Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The issue discusses that law should be implemented such that they are flexible enough to take into account various circumstances, time and places. If someone breaks the law, then before punishing the person, we should look at the circumstances under which person breaks the law.
It is said that the modern society functions smoothly due to well-implemented laws. All the members of the society follow the law and live in accordance with it. This allows all the other members of the society to live in peace. However, sometimes it may happen that people who generally follow the law are forced to break them under specific circumstances. In such cases, we should look at all the factors before arriving at the decision to punish the person or not.
One of the example which can be given is of an vehicle carrying an injured person. When someone is seriously injured and needs to be rushed to hospital, then the vehicle will be allowed to by-pass certain laws in order to protect the injured person. They are allowed to break certain laws, which in case of a normal vehicle would be wrong. Another example is of self-defence. When a person is being robbed or raped, then they can harm the vigilante who is a threat to them. If we do not take into account of the circumstance under which person is harming the vigilante, then this act of hurting someone is breaking the law and is punishable. But, as soon as we view the harming of vigilante under the circumstance of robbing or rape, the self-defence seems valid and the person can be extempted.
While it is true that a person should be judged while taking into account various circumstances, times and places, we should look at the seriousness of the law, which was broken. The seriousness of the impact that breaking of law has, and the harm this act causes is important while judging the person. While it is true that self-defence or rushing a vehicle to save someone is allowed, these should not mean that someone else should get seriously injured due to these action. Person breaking the law in this case should take care that other persons are not seriously harmed due to them. So, when a law is broken, any person cannot be judged in isolation, without looking at any reasons which may have cause him/her to take such an action. Circumstances should be listened, to understand what caused the person to break the law, and then depending on the reason, and the seriousness on which law was broken, punishment should be given to the person.
Hence, as discussed, law should be implemented in such a flexible way so that they can take into account the circumstances, times and places. And depending on these factors and the law broken, the person should be judged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of the example which can be given is of an vehicle carrying an injured person. Whe...
^^
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this action' or 'these actions'?
Suggestion: this action; these actions
...lse should get seriously injured due to these action. Person breaking the law in this case s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74947368421 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62001670503 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387368421053 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5586857825 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215878772741 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821385792832 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785099995455 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160254074397 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750285563992 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.