In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In current times, it is common to see a team of people working together, to solve a problem. Any problem solving required a continous discussion between team members, so that individual ideas can be presented to the team. Once an individual present an idea, it becomes team's responsibility to properly discuss the advantages and the disadvantages of the idea. These discussions often result in new ideas, which are an improvement over the existing solution presented. Such new ideas, continously coming up in discussions result in progress towards solving the problem.
In such teams, people tend to favour those team members who are having same point of view. This happenes because we find it easier to work with them because a superficial trust is build between these members as they think that their though process is same. This allows them to work more efficiently and faster than other team members. An example for this is a group of students studying together. If all the students have same process for studying a particular subject, then they could help each other in case of doubts, thus resolving issues faster. These same set of students, when working in a group for a project, which also work efficiently and will be able to finish the project faster.
While it being true that same point makes it eaiser for a team to function. This happens because dicussions are faster as every member of the team would be thinking in the same way and would reach approximately same conclusion. However, when groups of people are formed which same though processes, then they would not be able to view the loopholes in thought processes or ideas that are coming up. All the members would readily agree with the same idea and start to implement it, only later would they realise the drawbacks of that idea. This would result is very less progress over time. However, if members of contrasting views are present, then they would question the idea, the thought process which resulted in the idea. These contrasting views will help the team to find the loopholes before any efforts are made to implement the idea, saving them a lot of time. Not only contrasting views help team to identify flaws in an idea, they are also helpful when the group is stuck at some point. When people with different view points are present, then they would be able to dissect the problem, able to view it in differently. These would result in a number of innovative ideas, different from one another. Since members of the group are having contrasting view points, they would take each idea, analyse it properly, and would bring out points which are not thought of, when people of same view points discuss. So, due to contrasting view points, group will not remain stuck at a problem, and will be able to make progess faster. Suppose students are trying to solve a mathematics problem, in which they become stuck at some point. They students using different methods will be able to discuss the ways to view the problems and would find a new way to look at the issue, solving it faster. While students using same method, will stick to their view point, with students less likely to bring any contrasting point in solving the issue, and will remian stuck.
Thus, while same view point in a group helps by allowing they to work smoothly and faster. It becomes possible that they could get stuck at some point. It is only with constrasting view points that innovative solutions are born, and new ways to look at a solution come. So, contrating view points allows the group to look at problem in different way, making them more likely to come up with a new idea. This allows them progress in towards their goal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, thus, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3050.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 638.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78056426332 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02579962599 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41591731634 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.382445141066 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 906.3 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3041934818 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3870967742 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5806451613 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.03225806452 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16815116043 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563677598875 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396093545109 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107555058411 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281054323594 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.