Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Is evident that that law many times save a person of corruption, or save a life of other because of traffic and many others think. This way, the laws are a way to control the nation, is for this reason that I do not agree with the argument that the laws should be flexible enough account of various circumstances, times and places.
First, one time that a law, get harder for somebody check your things like bank count, is being more security for the society. For example, my mother have a friend that her name is Silvia. He is retired, and he has some health problems and she is not good enough to walk to long distance. Ever month Silvia needs goo to the bank because he needs take her money that she receive of her retired, and there is a law that he need an official document saying that only a specific person can take her money. Thus, she can satay more save, since that only conveyance person have access in her counts, since that in many places that do not have this law, already problems with Pearson that take money without permission.
Second, many laws make the in general safe, like the traffics law. For example, in my cities, have been a lot of accident with cars and motorcycling. When was observed that the number of occurrence was tall, the politics made some laws, that reduced the velocipede in the city. When somebody exceeded the permitted value has pay a count. Since, the accident reduced more than 80 percent. Staying clean that the law make betters for the city.
My third reason is politicians. For example, because Brazilian’s laws are flexile, many politicians enjoy of the situation and stolen a lot money of the government. This, can be see easily, since that, the law is less flexible, because was this way that in last year the Jude, has discovered and arrested many politicians.
In conclusion, I think hardy when in a country or city have flexile laws, since that the civilization tend to lose the control of the think. Thus, I do not agree with the argument showed, and I believe that laws need be strong enough in all circumstances, times and places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[2]
Message: The adverb 'Ever' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...t good enough to walk to long distance. Ever month Silvia needs goo to the bank beca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'traffics'' or 'traffic's'?
Suggestion: traffics'; traffic's
...laws make the in general safe, like the traffics law. For example, in my cities, have be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat reduced the velocipede in the city. When somebody exceeded the permitted value h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed the permitted value has pay a count. Since, the accident reduced more than 80 perc...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ivilization tend to lose the control of the think. Thus, I do not agree with the argument...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.624 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44724461839 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9570258598 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190097352427 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550039495424 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846721559214 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116163757675 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774131482489 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.