In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
There is a long-lasting discussion about whether imagination or knowledge are more valuable assets in the professional world. In some cases, experts argue that people who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without constraints. On the other hand, pundits claim that it is through experience that the imagination can flourish. We argue that both attitudes are fundamental to a professional success and that it is in the ability of knowing when to use one or another that lies the secret for professional success.
In a first glance, it could be argue that imagination is extremely important in some fields, such as design, liberal arts, literature, architecture, propaganda and drama. Although this is true, it has an assumption that other fields don’t need imagination. For instance, most of the people would say that it is more important to be creative in an artistic field rather than in a scientific one. However, this argument is overly simplistic. In fact, engineers, chemists and scientists also need imagination in order to make progress. In other worlds, in a chemical lab, for example, imagination is needed to choose what elements should be mixed and make other small decisions.
Nevertheless, knowledge is the perfect balance to imagination. Again, common sense would probably argue that knowledge is more important in some fields than in others. However, once again this is a misleading interpretation. Take a view in an artistic painting: knowing about the techniques, understanding the consequences of mixing to colours, mastering the effects of the colours in the painting are as important as having imagination. In the same direction, returning to our chemical lab example, knowledge is extremely important as well. In fact, it is through knowledge that imagination can be canalized in a more important way. Otherwise, there is a risk that imagination cannot be transformed in a practical result.
Therefore, we argue that it is the combination of both knowledge and imagination that matters in a professional world. Of course there are people more inclined to imagination and people that rely more in experience and knowledge, but the better professionals are those that can use both in a clever way. And, as ironic it may seem, knowing when to use experience and when to use imagination it is also a skill that is developed through the combination of both imagination and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a clever way" with adverb for "clever"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ofessionals are those that can use both in a clever way. And, as ironic it may seem, knowing wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22506393862 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14361891124 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455242966752 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7132365951 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.15 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265238280281 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746155064064 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647774736017 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154481459498 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384564165044 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.