A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until the enter college.
Education is one of the most imperative factors for the development and property of society. In the present world, most developed countries have higher education ratios. Although not every country follows the same educational curriculum all over the world. The above prompt sets about that a nation should expedite the same national curriculum before entering college. While, I concede that the same national curriculum should be implemented all over the nation, in my opinion, I mostly disagree with the above prompt for two reasons.
To begin, implementing the same curriculum may hamper the talents of the nation. Every student is not good at everything, each individual is precocious in various fields. Implementing the same curriculum may be baleful for their dreams, hopes, happiness, or most probably for their mental health. For instance, a student, who does not like math but likes to play piano and wants to be a great artist like Felix Mendelssohn in the future. If the curriculum does not focus too much on music, then the student’s talent may be wasted. Even if it is not the case, happiness and mental satisfaction are pivotal factors for a student to improve his performance. Forcing something, that a student hastes, may have pernicious effects on him. He will be hopeless and most probably renounce his dreams before they begin. Thus, having the same curriculum in schools is not much of a good idea, because of that many talents of the country will be lost and there will be a significant increase of mentally depressed people which may inhibit the nation’s progress.
Furthermore, the same curriculum may hamper the preferred career choice of a person. To develop some skills, special training needs to be begun at a very early age and if one can not afford to start the training after completing school, it will be too late to pursue the career. For example, football is a sport, for which special trains should begin at a very early age. At the time of college, it will be too late to pursue the dream. Many football players, like Christian Ronaldo, officially started playing football around the age of 13-14. If a curriculum does not have the options for choosing football, then, it will be insidious for the student’s career and dreams. The above example illustrates that under the same curriculum all over the nation, every student will not get the same opportunity to prosper and improve in other words rigidity of some curricula hamper the right of choice of some students’ which may have devastating effects.
However, facilitating implying the same curriculum throughout the nation may have some beneficial effects; every student all over the country will have equal exposure. For example, not all schools all over India have better education systems and consummate teachers due to funding or communication problems. Most of the students of these schools do not get enough exposures to compete with the students of highly reputed schools. Having the same curriculum may reduce this problem to a certain extent. This example shows that having the same curriculum may give equal exposure to every student in the country.
Despite these reasons national curriculum does have its merits such as the promotion of national harmony in a peaceful state, the level playing field for all students, etc, but such advantages are overshadowed by the potential disadvantages which are much more severe in nature. So a common curriculum is not advised for a nation rather certain common elements in the curriculum is more suitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...countries have higher education ratios. Although not every country follows the same educ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2983.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 585.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09914529915 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69956152098 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 939.6 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5446144575 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.535714286 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8928571429 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305543941429 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970736927545 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923708646715 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204560733643 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590615962228 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.