"A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they entercollege rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academiccourses to offer."

Essay topics:

"A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter
college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic
courses to offer."

Providing one type of program for all students of the nation is better than existence of the various types of the program for graduating in their high school degree owing to having a level of standard and would be fair for all the students who are trained by such a schedule. Otherwise, this uniqueness may impede learning due to not being locally according to any states and its requirements. In fact, each state may have some priority compared to other ones.

Providing an equal form of training for whole the nation leads to enable all the college to have minimum level of standard prepared by the governor. This standard enables students to study properly in any situation where it may have poor or rich condition. And, they should be trained by these courses of study regardless of their status and position in their society. For example, some regions of the USA are inhabited by some foreigner have same curriculum like the native one. These persons can be educated like the entire nation, leading to providing similar opportunity for their career's future. To illustrate more, standardization makes a clear way for them to be successful person even in their life.

Equivalent form of training can also bring some advantages, including being fairly and egalitarian type. Each successful community requires fair atmosphere for thriving in the future, and this fair condition will note be created unless it would be provided in any sorts of aspects like training. This fair form of education can be created by equal course. Unique program shows that people have access to any thing fairly and freely. Governor who provides such an ambient for its education can be stable in its position during the time since people know that they are considered equally to be educated from the beginning of the education, which is high school until later. For instances, people of the suburb can sense it fairly to educated like those who live in the capital, and this sensation enables them to be prosperous person in the future.

Aside from the foregoing two provisos, however, I strongly believe that same type of the program may preclude learning owing to not being derived according to the need of the people who live in various states. In fact, diversely form of living and various conditions requires heterogeneous form of educating. For instance, in one state, governor needs people to be trained some important lessons of the history of the state since they live in the historical place, however, in the other continent, governor involves people in sporting owing to having natural place like sea and river for training. So, these continents will impede learning, if they provide same program considerably. Consider such diversity in the form of living and also condition, state should adopt itself with variable course and schedule.

In sum, unless states have variety in their condition and in their live which required adoptable and locally program, losing its fairly condition and minimum level of education, if governor will not create the unique course.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...rogram shows that people have access to any thing fairly and freely. Governor who provide...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 120, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to owe'.
Suggestion: to owe
...pe of the program may preclude learning owing to not being derived according to the n...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 126, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...d adoptable and locally program, losing its fairly condition and minimum level of e...
^^^
Line 12, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnor will not create the unique course.
^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233273056058 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.157323688969 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0867992766727 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0452079566004 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0397830018083 0.0444667217837 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.12292977631 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0669077757685 0.0406280797675 165% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56043433559 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0325497287523 0.030933414821 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0958408679928 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0289330922242 0.0249443105267 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144665461121 0.0148568991511 97% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3076.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 507.0 452.878318584 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06706114398 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378698224852 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285996055227 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199211045365 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118343195266 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56043433559 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 219.290929204 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455621301775 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.4033990821 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1428571429 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6785703658 59.4972553346 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.476190476 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.380952380952 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 52.7424626655 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.82835820896 1.64882698954 111% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338493890151 0.391690518653 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100067268027 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0840029707834 0.077325440228 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49952521099 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194074463242 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130365900575 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756657470463 0.0892212321368 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454412202679 0.385218514788 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.072940916242 0.0692045440612 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234256052539 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796692565148 0.0653680567796 122% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.