A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The subject of education, understandably so, has many points of view that range from parents wanting to dictate what their offspring should learn to other individuals wanting to standardize the content taught in schools. Specifically, I tend to agree with the idea that a nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum until they get to college. This provides a more efficient system that ultimately benefits the citizens of the country.
One idea is that it is better to standardize the curriculum, so no students are disadvantaged by local governments that may want to alter the curriculum for a wide variety of reasons. We all know corruption exists in the world and it will never disappear. There will be times when alternative interests in non-federal governments may contrast with the benefit of the citizens. In those instances, politicians may be swayed to meddle with the curriculum. One issue occurring at the time, is the argument behind using public education funds to allow some students to get private education. This obviously draws a wedge between the affluent and the rest of the population. Some may feel entitled to elect private schools, others feel that if we are not focused on public education, then only those who can afford private institutions will be exposed to a better education system which will leave some students behind. If the curriculum is standardized, then it puts everyone on the same level and doesn't negatively influence a segment of the population.
Furthermore, if we have one single national curriculum, it will allow for better preparation from a systematic point of view. By having all the citizens involved in one issue, then the participation from all of them should drive the system forward. And because we only have on system to work with, it should be easier to manage compared to having one system per city.
In contrast with this point of view, challengers may feel their personal freedom affected by being negated their choice to elect what they consider the best for their children. This would be valid without context, but again elected representatives should be elected based on their experience and knowledge. So, having experts in charge should make the system better as the future of the nation will be the focus of those leaders.
Having a single curriculum for the education system of a nation has a better outcome and should be the standard in every country. It minimizes the chances of corruption or negative outside influences from taking advantage of the system. By having everyone in the same curriculum, if anyone wants to change it, then all eyes will be on the issue as everyone will be affected by it. For this same reason, people will put experts in place to operate the education system, and as a result it will be of greater benefit for the country itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 995, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... it puts everyone on the same level and doesnt negatively influence a segment of the p...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...d to having one system per city. In contrast with this point of view, challengers ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97083333333 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7689216463 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477083333333 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5968284725 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.619047619 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16775197291 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596016694665 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072138631689 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112334255084 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512395226012 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.