Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author here claims that nations should preserve remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gains. While it's true that increasing industrialization, needs cheap land, labor, and resources but we fail to observe the interaction between the industries and nature. The increasing number of factories has to lead to a natural imbalance. It is necessary to preserve the natural habitat of life, in order to have a long and healthy living. But we cannot ignore the fact that the fast-paced world with cutting edge technological advancements requires to convert the forest covers to habitual and industrial areas. A deeper introspection into the topics will give a clearer understanding.
Forests or wilderness areas are the natural habitats for several animals and endangered species. These species cannot survive in a manmade environment thus, become extinct before one can even administer the problem with their shrinking numbers. Take the example, the Bengal Tiger. The majestic species saw a sharp drop in number in the late nineties due to deforestation, poaching, and industrialization of their habitats. To improve the numbers and preserve tigers, Project Tiger was launched in India and, the majority of the tiger habitats were declared as wildlife sanctuaries. Strict imposition of laws will lead to the species flourishing again. In order to preserve the rich flora and fauna, it is necessary to stop the encroachment of forest covers for industrial gains.
Recent times have seen a sharp spike in the pollution levels in cities. Glaciers are melting and flooding the rivers causing widespread destruction. Thick tree cover is required in valleys to bind the soil and refill the groundwater table. Concrete surfaces in the middle of the mountains are the reason why soil erosion and flooded rivers have become a massive problem. Such times require increased tree cover and not techno-parks. The bizarre Australian forest fires lead to massive loss of forests and wildlife. The increasing number of floods, forest fires, a sharp increase in temperature, and a hole in the ozone layer are the clear indication of increasing global warming. Nations should come together to save the remaining wilderness areas in their natural areas to prevent human extinction.
It is true that with the increasing population, mankind requires land for not only industrialization but also for a habitual purpose. For economic gains, it is necessary to cut down the expenses on land and resources but not at the cost of losing wildlife. Forests and uncultivated land provide cheap land for setting up huge industries and colonies. But they also become a threat to the life around it. In order to save the flora and fauna, it is necessary that nations need to maintain forest cover above certain specified limits.
In order to preserve the endangered species and tackle the growing problem of global warming, it is necessary that nations save the remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. Without a healthy lifestyle, it is impossible to make any social or economical progress. Global bodies like the United Nations should lead this agenda to safeguard the wilderness areas, follow strict rules, and punish the guilty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'converting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: converting
...dge technological advancements requires to convert the forest covers to habitual and indus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding life'?
Suggestion: the surrounding life
...onies. But they also become a threat to the life around it. In order to save the flora and fauna, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... it is impossible to make any social or economical progress. Global bodies like the United...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, while, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28871892925 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86008576684 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502868068834 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5917934301 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3793103448 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0344827586 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.68965517241 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249756997097 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623653887983 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105760928322 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147545687843 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587939288908 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.