Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Arts are the expression of imagination and our emotion, we express our joy to morose through some kind of arts. Some arts are becoming a definition of an era. Nations prosperity sometimes define by creations of arts. The funding of art from the government is trifle but an important source, the copious investment comes from philanthropic and private investment. The statement does not state the nation should cancel the investment but suspend the investment during the emergency situation.
First of all, a nation job is to coddle its' people and the prosperity of the economy of a nation. In the situation of the great depression, a government job is to provide adequate food and job to the denizens. People, where do not have the money to eat and do not have works, going to museum and art, is a luxury. The money should be spent on the citizen's education, shelter, and food. The prosperity of art and prosperity of a nation is proportional to each other. For example, we can not see a war zone country prosper in arts or people demanding for a museum, the imagination does not work in hunger. The art usually prospers where the economy of a country is steady and people having or fulfilling their basic needs.
On the other hand, many people argue that art is a form of a job and plenty of people actually get money from their art. There are myriad of examples where art creates a revolution or many arts mirror the reality of society. But in the situation where people are live in hunger and can not fulfill their basic need, a government should support the citizens and protect their basic rights. Because art is not a basic right of a human, besides art can prosper with other alter investment.
At the end of the epilogue of the topic I would say the art could be significant work and a statement of expression, suspending them might be sound harsh and unfeasible, but in order to provide the basic needs to the citizens during emergency situation suspension of funds to the art is a cogent step.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...uxury. The money should be spent on the citizens education, shelter, and food. The prosp...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, so, for example, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64325842697 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6456484198 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466292134831 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6268245956 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2352941176 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287370654251 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890460586503 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372906400577 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170422698228 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123273201302 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.