As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays, technology exists in our daily life pervasively and some argument may arise that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. In my opinion, I partly agree the argument according to the following reasons.
It’s more and more common that labors are replaced with machines for people invent many smart robots to do these boring work. Owing to this trend, we human beings should make good use of the creativity and management, that machines still cannot develop those skills, to get the job. It’s likely that assembling the cellphone doesn’t require labor anymore, instead, the factory prefer electronic equipment to accomplish the task. Meanwhile, the owners can cut down the cost and maximize the profit. Consequently, it’s obvious that people have to think for themselves more to avoid being fired in the era leaded by technology.
Children born in poorer countries are able to learn and absorb new knowledge thanks to the technology. Few decade ago, we often considered that most of the African kids couldn’t receive adequate education compared with Asian or American counterparts. Nevertheless, this tragic time was over because of the latest technique and prevalent internet. Currently, those kids staying in under-developed countries have more opportunities to reach the basic knowledge. Even though the number of teachers aren’t enough to impart the new information, the students there can also enrich themselves with exploring knowledge on their own to connect with the world. In other words, they have more time think and learn owing to the development of technology.
However, some may argue that people often lose their fundamental ability to differentiate the truth of the article or news. It’s possible that some media platforms exploit the horrible titles to attract the clicking rate. In the hectic daily life, we usually receive a piece of information through the brief topic so we spread what we saw without any careful check. As this kind of cases accumulate gradually, the vicious circle has formed. It’s true that sometimes technology deprives our thinking ability because of too many information flowing in the smartphone, notebooks, and so on.
To sum up, it’s partially correct that when people rely more and more on technology, the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 714, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to owe'.
Suggestion: to owe
...ds, they have more time think and learn owing to the development of technology. Ho...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ves our thinking ability because of too many information flowing in the smartphone, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...ves our thinking ability because of too many information flowing in the smartphone, notebooks, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, as for, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.424 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84158828826 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602666666667 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0096939089 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219076123139 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639110143448 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865026875013 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153670868965 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099236848418 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.