As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author states that relying on technology deteriorate the human ability to think for themselves in order to solve their own problems. This statement is not true as in could be investigated through some evidence.
For instance, relying on technology save more time for human and effort as well. To demonistrate, relying on technology have resulted by iinvestion of automobiles and various transportation means which saved plenty of time and effort on daily bases for the people. Consequently, people ability to think for themselves is enhaved. For example, a man who is always tired physically and of a limited free time during his daily routine would definitly have a lower level of thinking than a relaxed man who have a plenty of free time to devote it for thinking about a certain issues of this personal issues.
Furthermore, relying on technology have facilated the access of people to any of the data that might be needed to develope a proper decision resulted from a proper thinking way. To illustrate, throughinternet the ease of the access to a vast various amount of data have been available to people of any age in no time. Whereas, people could review the past experiance about any issue that they facing and then people could easily reach to the best thoughtable solution and thinking ways for themselves.
Conversely, relyomg more and more on technology have resulted in a lower social inteligency individuals. As individuals are communicating through internet and via technology of computer and cell phones, which adulterated the in person communication and social intelegincy. So many people ability to think socially is deteriorated, specially the new generation. However, people could have found a new technics through internet and cell phones technology nowadays which is video calling. Via video calls people have become able to communicate exactly same as if they were together in the same place, seeing each others and talking each others. Thus, relying on technology is not a reason for derterioration of the people ability to think for themselves.
These previously illusterated evidences is a sample of a set of evidences, which bolster the fact that technology has not any influence on human thinking deterioration. Conversely, techniology has enabled a much easier way for human kind to think for themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author states that relying on technology deteriorate the human ability to think f...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... investigated through some evidence. For instance, relying on technology save...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tain issues of this personal issues. Furthermore, relying on technology have ...
^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king way. To illustrate, throughinternet the ease of the access to a vast various...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and thinking ways for themselves. Conversely, relyomg more and more on tec...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple ability to think for themselves. These previously illusterated evidences ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22486772487 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02245753867 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497354497354 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3936567922 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.176470588 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278696956281 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108852750221 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690398215173 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165763625201 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425101938283 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.