"As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate."
Technology is man's new best friend. We don't see a single person in his/her daily life who doesn't take the benefit of it. When it comes to the given claim that it is deteriorating human thinking ability, I would say YES to some extent and NO as well for 2 reasons.
Of course, technology is making people's life easier and faster but depending on it for each small thing is making things unknowingly worse to an individual indirectly. Technology is not only decreasing the human ability to think, it is also making people lazy. Since there's so much advancement in technology lately, it is accessible to anyone who has smart phones or who can afford an internal connection with minimal bandwidth. Now a days, people are using calculators to do the simple calculation of 6 multiplied by 7 instead of using their brain or ordering food from a restaurant in 100 meters radius instead of walking. There's nothing wrong with using what is widely and openly available but the extent of the usage is what matters.
On the other hand, how do we have so much innovations in the recent years, if the human thinking ability was decreased due to technology? In fact, if not anything else, it is making people to put more effort and hard work, to be competitive in the market or bring new solutions to the problem in the world.
Based on the above explanations, there's no straight answer to this claim since the issue is very complex and there are no easy answers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
Technology is mans new best friend. We dont see a single person in his/her daily li...
^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...single person in his/her daily life who doesnt take the benefit of it. When it comes t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...ity, I would say YES to some extent and NO as well for 2 reasons. Of course, ...
^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...k, it is also making people lazy. Since theres so much advancement in technology latel...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...rnal connection with minimal bandwidth. Now a days, people are using calculators to do the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... connection with minimal bandwidth. Now a days, people are using calculators to do the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brain or ordering food from a restaurant in 100 meters radius instead of walking....
^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...n 100 meters radius instead of walking. Theres nothing wrong with using what is widely...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... On the other hand, how do we have so much innovations in the recent years, if the...
^^^^
Line 13, column 34, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
.... Based on the above explanations, theres no straight answer to this claim since ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in fact, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68217054264 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62949861475 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3772333858 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.818181818 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165974760433 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613347567695 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619253700239 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856710853813 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556410112778 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.