People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
More you study about a subject, more you realize how little you know, this statement, a famous saying is undeniably a fact. People who flaunt their knowledge at a subject tend to have just brushed the surface, let alone reach a periphery. The prompt states that people who are deeply committed to an idea are the ones who are the most critical of it, and I fully agree. Below are the two major reason to back my thought.
More in-depth ones knowledge about a subject is, more they get to know about it's flaws, for intance the famous scientist Steven Hawkins, widely regarded as one, if not the best scientist to have touched the face of earth. He discovered his theory about blackholes, only to refute it years later, because as he studied about his own theorems, he was able to find flaws in is that nobody else could find. This example asserts that people who know a lot about a subject are the ones who will be most critical of it when a flaw comes to notice.
Critics, be it movies, songs, folklore or any other form of art, science, any department infact, they all have one thing in common - their knowledge about that particular subject. Take for example Einsietn, another of the great scientists, he was able to discover the vast infinities of space and propose the theory of relativity because he was a critic of the great mathematician and scientist - Newton. Einstien had immense knowledge in Newtonian physics and even took up physics in his university years at ETH Zurich. He was a scholar at Newtonian physics and yet he was the one who was the most critical of Newtons works. This example states the importance of the knowledge required to become a valuable critic, and assserts that the people who have entrenched ideas in their minds are the people who could critisize them.
Yes there are indeed people without much knowledge about a subject and yet are the first to critisize. For example- even the greatest sports personalities, who have achieved everything that is there to be achieved, have won things people can't even dream of are criticized by fans all around the globe, like the dislike for Messi or Ronaldo, Vettel or Hamilton, Federrer, Nadal or Djokovic etc. This type of criticism can't be taken seriously, simply because these are just cunjuctures, these aren't constructive criticisms, these are the anger from people who tend to support one player and hate one.
So in conclusion, it is obvious that people with the atmost knowledge are the ones who know the ins and outs of a topic and these are the ones who will be the most critical when time arives. Constructive critisism like these are the reason our society prospers, critics who understand what they question are a boon to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | s.sim | 62 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | Jatin Chaudhari | 57 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Abyaz Abid | 58 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | tengriqagan | 66 | view |
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 83
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are famous fo 73
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 79
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... to be achieved, have won things people cant even dream of are criticized by fans al...
^^^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...or Djokovic etc. This type of criticism cant be taken seriously, simply because thes...
^^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...cause these are just cunjuctures, these arent constructive criticisms, these are the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, in conclusion, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74159663866 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49960431735 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506302521008 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3302821001 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.764705882 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185747911832 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690548527356 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665309513469 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12383551916 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796890694095 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.