People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The argument made that decisions makers who make decisions on emotion are poor decision makers is highly convincing and can be bolstered by several examples. But in spite of these, there exist some circumstances where emotional decision making can be more benefiting.
First and foremost, it is prudent to say that emotional pondering over any issue clouds your thinking capabilities and narrows down your thinking horizon. A person thinking emotionally cannot ponder about the gamut of the ramifications his/her emotionally driven decision could have. In contrast, cerebral decision-making lets you deal with decisions more wisely and handle even nuanced cases.
Besides these, we know that our emotional thinking is based on the biases and several fallacious assumptions and personal experiences which doesn't lead the mind to a sound decision. As an example, in our daily life, we take several decisions based on superstitions and then we try to justify them with baseless claims, but the majority of those decisions seems to fail against a decision taken logically. Moreover as an example in competitive games, we tend to get swayed away with fervour and take decisions individually which is detrimental to the team and as a result witness failure, whereas a team taking decisions logically win. This can be witnessed from our daily life experiences.
Apart from this, making a decision and then justifying them does not seem reasonable, because human tends to rationalize everything to make them seem correct. Whereas utilising rational thinking and then decision making leads to a sound decision.
Up until now, we saw how emotional thinking foreshadows our reasoning power, but in some circumstances, this emotional thinking leads us to improve and take bold steps. In several circumstances, where the human mind is marked with extreme forlorn, and logically the chances of success of is very gloomy, in those case a positive emotion can help a person buttress his/her motivation and in several of those situations motional think ing leads to much more propitious decisions.
In the end, I would like to conclude by saying that human being is driven both by rationality and emotions, thus a sound decision takes place when there is an amalgamation of both in the decision-making process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...umptions and personal experiences which doesnt lead the mind to a sound decision. As a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ail against a decision taken logically. Moreover as an example in competitive games, we ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 444, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ose situations motional think ing leads to much more propitious decisions. In ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, apart from, in contrast, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3087431694 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92593866703 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4527383176 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.785714286 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430913670777 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160444080688 0.0831039109588 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108703707969 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228526077511 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867490011981 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.