People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
I agree to the statement stating that people who make decisions based on emotions and justify these decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. I believe that decisions should be based on proper judgement of the situation, no matter whatever the case is, or if it new to one or not. Acting instantly out of emotion can always tend to faulty calculations where we might have overlooked serious repercussions that are likely to occur.
Weighing the pros and cons of any issue before drawing a final conclusion and acting upon that conclusion exemplifies a person as wiser than the rest. Sometimes, we cannot think rationally if an incident is deeply troubling or disturbing to us. In the earlier centuries, kings and queens faced severe difficult situations that aroused due to their superior positions in monarchy, and they themselves had to take care of the conundrums by making decisions based on their wits, not motions. If any emperor in history has by any chance taken a decision based on his heartfelt emotion rather than looking through every angles of the subject, we have learned that they failed miserably to bring justice, since the decisions were poorly made.
It is not unlikely that new and completely unknown difficulty can engender and loom over us at the most unpredictable period, and sometimes, we might not have the sufficient time or experience to act based on logically appropriate manner, that is to say, we might not react the way that is expected of us.However, acting out of instinct led by our emotions sometimes, can make a better judgement than a decision or action made with deliberate efforts. For example, animal rescuers have to save the animals from absolutely dangerous situations, and that too within a very congested period of time. If they do not make the decisions rapidly, putting the emotion of being a superhero and acting as a saviour first in line instead of thinking of their own lives, they would not make history in proving that humanity still exists in mankind.
I conclude that decisions should always be attempted, if not always possible in every case to be applied, with deliberate logical thinking and not emotions. That way, we have barely minimum chances of being faced with a worse outcome, since we have taken decisions with a clear head.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ot react the way that is expected of us.However, acting out of instinct led by our emot...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter judgement than a decision or action made with deliberate efforts. For exampl...
^^
Line 11, column 583, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s, and that too within a very congested period of time. If they do not make the decisions rapi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 819, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e history in proving that humanity still exists in mankind. I conclude that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, still, for example, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00257731959 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68329914929 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7579469765 60.3974514979 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.75 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402996733485 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155007522787 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208155182596 0.0758088955206 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266570978931 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150853112483 0.0667264976115 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.