People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Decision making by a human being depends on the situation in which the choice is to be made. If the decision is to be taken in celerity, we tend to rely much on our emotions, while if the considerable amount of time is available, cerebration is bossy over the emotions. It is the major character of human psychology to discreet one's position. The decision is best buttressed by the logic. However, the extent to which logic operates determines the quality of the decision-maker. If we consider the best decision to the one that instigates sustainable well-being, the decision-maker must always be receptive towards the criticisms and take into consideration of dynamism of the post-decision circumstances. However, if one transgresses the boundary till which the logic is sound and convincing, the worth of decision is belied by the insolence of the defender.
Often we tend to decide based on our emotions. Our emotions are nothing but the collection of our past experiences and the imprints of their cerebration. However, a decision-maker is indeed a leader, whose conscience affects others as well. Therefore, the decision-maker must be chary not to be bossy and superimposing. Hitler, the infamous autocrat, had his own emotion behind the holocaust. But as his emotion was based on jaundiced assumptions, and he didn't consider the sustainable well-being before his power to decide, ultimately led to the dilapidation. It is a typical example, where the leader lacking conscience and rife with biased emotion can invite dilapidation. He had tried to defend his decision by using the logic of eugenics, but the time proved him wrong, and his logic irrelevant. Thus, logic works best when it is used to defend the noble cause.
The decision always follows the backup of logic. Whatever be the situation and source of decision, impetuous and emotional or deliberate and mental, logic follows as appurtenant. However, the extent to which a decision-maker carries the ambit of his logic, and on what ground, marks all the difference. If the decision-maker has inclusive behavior and is flexible enough to address every voice, just the justification with logic can make him no poor decision-maker. However, if the logic is mishandled to express scornful disdain and prig, whatever and however the decision making process was, the decision-maker is always poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...s are nothing but the collection of our past experiences and the imprints of their cerebration. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... based on jaundiced assumptions, and he didnt consider the sustainable well-being bef...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 868, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n it is used to defend the noble cause. The decision always follows the backup o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was, the decision-maker is always poor.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20734908136 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18919563313 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503937007874 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0521730816 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4761904762 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38095238095 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391121648938 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132212869254 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914853041416 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290345524945 0.150359130593 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072817570468 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.