People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
For decision making I am with using logic more than emotions since emotion can not show the perfect picture and the right angle to see the problem and the possible solutions for that problem, also if only logic is considered during the decision making the output will be bad since this decisions will effect humans so their emotions and the conseconses of that decision on their life becasue we are live in socity and we deal with people in daily basis we can not make decision based on logic only, yes logic may provide the most profitible solutions but it may hurt others. But if only emotions used in decision making the output will not provide any progress and will cause bad results becasue decision based on emotions only depends on the way people fells and their emtional statues at that moment which is not constant and will lead to poor decisions in that case, most of these type of people who make decision on their emotions will try to justify or explaine their decisions using logic since the output will be bad and it's their responsibility so they try to find away out of that position.
I think that using logic with a little emotions to make decision is the best way a will provide good output and if not the responsibility on the decision maker will be less since any one in his position will make the same decision because logic in constant in all situations with all people.
I agree that people using only emotions and no logic at all their decisions will effect them and everyone under that decision in a bad way, also it expecteed that they will try to escape from that responsibility by saying that they used logic as people can not disagree with logic if it is correct.
For people in a leading position emotion in decision making is not an option since they wili affect alot of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ion making the output will be bad since this decisions will effect humans so their e...
^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...t will be bad since this decisions will effect humans so their emotions and the consec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1029, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... logic since the output will be bad and its their responsibility so they try to fin...
^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'emotion'?
Suggestion: emotion
... I think that using logic with a little emotions to make decision is the best way a will...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n the decision maker will be less since any one in his position will make the same deci...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...nd no logic at all their decisions will effect them and everyone under that decision i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t them and everyone under that decision in a bad way, also it expecteed that they will try t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55351681957 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29580727541 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418960244648 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 65.0 23.0359550562 282% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 168.119719248 60.3974514979 278% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 297.8 118.986275619 250% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 65.4 23.4991977007 278% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463938072887 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.305175880757 0.0831039109588 367% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598421211113 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307899224059 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084259360215 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.7 14.1392134831 231% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 13.96 48.8420337079 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.5 12.1743820225 226% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.0 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.0 11.2143820225 250% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.7820224719 238% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.