People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
The issue that people’s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole is a contentious one. I believe the people’s attitude is determined both by their immediate situation and by society as a whole. The percentage of each side would vary from person to person. While each side is essential, it would be handicapped to neglect either side.
People’s attitude is determined by their immediate situation or surrounding when there is a situation of emergency or difficulty. The attitude of a will be predominantly depended on the immediate situation when his family is in a difficulty, or there is a difficult situation surrounding him. For example, when there is a situation of a natural calamity like fire explosion, the attitude of the person will be completely dependent on the situation to save the people in the building than on the society. One more example would be in a situation where a person’s family is going through a difficulty, his attitude will be to rectify the problem before he can start thinking about the society. Therefore, I believe in situations of difficulties and emergencies, their immediate situation and surroundings determine people's attitudes.
On the other hand, the attitude of leaders and politicians would be based on the society rather than their surroundings or situation. I believe because their family or surroundings became the society, they became the leader. For example, while taking the decisions of nuclear power plants or percentage of taxes, I believe the attitude of the leaders will be dependent on the society because these decisions impact the society directly. Therefore, I believe that the attitude of the leaders and politicians would be based on the society which is needed for the betterment of the society.
While the attitude based on society is justifiable, they can not neglect their immediate situation or surroundings. If a leader completely bases his opinions based on the society leaving his family or surrounding, it would not be impactful. For example, if his family is going through a problem, he would not be happy and which will, in turn, impact his opinions that are based on society. I believe a person cannot be hundred percent efficient if his opinions are only based on the society. Similarly, if the opinions of a person are based solely on the surrounding or situation, it would not be perfect. For example, in situations like usage of plastics where a person starts to use excessive usage of plastics in his daily life because they are cheap, it would have hazardous effects on the society as the plastic is harmful to the environment.
In conclusion, I believe the people’s attitude is determined both by their immediate situation and society as a whole. The percentage of each side would vary from person to person. For example, the leaders and politicians would be more tilted towards society and normal citizen would be tilted towards surroundings which is justifiable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...n society. I believe a person cannot be hundred percent efficient if his opinions are o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15587044534 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05730280277 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.327935222672 0.4932671777 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1674324409 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.772727273 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410232530994 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185396153062 0.0831039109588 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201431332166 0.0758088955206 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298325462315 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14096807021 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.