The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Undoubtedly, music is considered as one of the most versatile fields of interests. As the author claims that the real talent of a popular musician is only celebrated or lauded after the death of the musician for several generations which is not necessarily true. The fact that there are various types of music which can be produced in various ways just makes it slightly difficult to identify the talent of the musician. However, the talent is surely identified over the time and does not need the death of the musician.
Firstly, any musician who produces a music need not be always original, it can be an addition to the previously produced symphony or harmonies. So, it does not mean that the music thus produced is derivative in quality. Also, a musician is said to be "popular" when their work is loved and cherished by the audience, that itself is the assessment of their work. As we may know, music is a vast field of study so to understand each subject in that field and apply that knowledge to produce your own music takes time. Unlike, a game which just requires some amount of practice or luck to get identified as a talented person.
Moreover, that music produced by each musician is not original in all aspects.It can be somewhat apocryphal. Also, our history suggests that many musicians present in their time produced marvellous and laudable music but unfortunately did not receive the appreciation they deserved due to many social, political factors. However, it was only a matter of time when advancement in knowledge and ability to take proper decisions in human evolved, those musicians are treated as experts of the music they produced several years ago.
Also, nowadays talent and the success of a particular work is judged by democratic opinions. It means that a person may like a particular type of music and consider that musician to be very skillful, but the same type of music would be banal or cliché for another person. So it depends on the type of person listening to the music which suggests that there are generation gaps in the society. Even though every musician strives to produce better and better music each time, the only talented and gifted musicians are successful in doing so.
Conclusively, while it is true for some ancient music that got recognized lately than expected. The musicians involved in producing those music where somewhat unlucky to not to receive a kind of appreciation. Although, every music should be primarily original to be considered popular. It is not true that the musician must be dead to get his work appreciated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...musician is not original in all aspects.It can be somewhat apocryphal. Also, our h...
^^
Line 17, column 133, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this music' or 'those musics'?
Suggestion: this music; those musics
...ed. The musicians involved in producing those music where somewhat unlucky to not to receiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... not to receive a kind of appreciation. Although, every music should be primarily origin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76396155383 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479545454545 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3592965003 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217279153694 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806629850717 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561380611956 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14527777318 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531204203139 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.