Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated.
How to ensure that student studying in university are truly educated? Does learning underlying concepts and theories only on the subject of major make student completely educated? Or having knowledge in diverse educational field makes them educated. This topic is subject of moot. Here, the author of prompt claims that the best way to be assured that student are truly educated is to entailing university students to take variety of course outside his field. I mostly agree with the contention and defend my thesis based on two persuasive argument with evidence and also provide qualification that first priority should be to be perfect in the subject of major.
Firstly, having outside knowledge apart from acedemics is advantageous in many ways. One of the advantage of having knowledge on diverse field is that some of the flaws and problems incurred in our own acedemic field can be solved with the help of concepts and tools provided by compeletely different field of education. For instance, the CAD softwares which is related to computer field replaced rigorous manual drawing of engineering field. Similarly, various tools in mathematics and statstics are used in solving various problems in other field like engineering, accounting, law and political field. So, having outside knowledge is very fruitful in contributing in any field by solving underlying flaws and mistakes.
Secondly, study of our particular major field makes our learning provincial as they gives us knowledge that we require in future in securing job. In other hand, if we step outside of our acedemic field, we may find many other field more interesting and suited for us. So it can help in providing insight to various field of education and thereby, helps in changing our major in interested field. For instance, a mechanical engineer may find artwork more compelling and may also find out that he even has skill to perform some artistic creation. So, looking at his ability, he can shift his field of education from mechanical engineering to art. So, exploring various field may help us to find our true field which we are more interesting and subject we are best at.
Admittedly however, student should give first priority to his acedemics. Students should not stray away from his subject matter. It may cause decline in his grade and overall performance in his own subject. It is best to first have profound knowledge on the subject matter of our field and then look to other field for educating ourselves.
In conclusion, the subject matter is moot and there are no easy answers to the question of taking interest on other field of education. However, glancing on juxtaposition of two opposing view, knowledge of diverse field have more merit than adhering to same field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to underlie'.
Suggestion: to underlie
...rsity are truly educated? Does learning underlying concepts and theories only on the subje...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ving knowledge on diverse field is that some of the flaws and problems incurred in our own ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...d makes our learning provincial as they gives us knowledge that we require in future ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...to art. So, exploring various field may help us to find our true field which we are more intere...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09450549451 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69783241182 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487912087912 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7769513308 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.782608696 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7826086957 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270592595026 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898183687797 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102999237957 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153320801105 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106919943923 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.