Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Otherwise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped. - GRE Issue 109
At first glance, the statement seems persuasive. I agree that everyone has their own talent in various fields. However, in my opinion, this statement goes too far by identifying those children at an early age. If this letter was followed, there's no human right at all, besides it might hurt the entire society rather than benefit it.
First of all, base on human rights, we should value every child in the same way, it's unfair to treated kids differently. Despite, how to decide or identify their talents at an early age? Life is like a marathon, every child has their own schedule, by training them separately my be a cause-and-effect. Their performance may be different because they are treated distinctively. If we separated those kids before they are fully developed, it might be a misjudgment. For example, a kid who shows talent in language at 3-year doesn't mean it will continue, he or she might end-up good at math a few years later.
Second, education should be citizen right, not exclusive to people we can afford it. Nowadays, a lot of parents send their kids to after schools and talents class for a better chance to get admission from a good university, it is a disadvantage for those families who cannot afford those courses and being behind kids from middle-class families. Regarding this phenomenon, the difference between rich and poor for this society will become bigger. It's already unfair under this after school system, we should not treat students differently in schools.
Last, talent doesn't mean habit. Children's thoughts matter, we should value their opinions too not making decisions for them. For instance, one might be good at computer science but not interested in coding at all, instead, he or she enjoys playing music. People usually work hard when they love their works. They might not show talent at first but they can do better after hard working.
To sum up, it seems reasonable that everyone focuses on their own specialty but it should not misplace that we should differentiate kids at an early age. It would cause lots of problems such as the psychological health of children since they're not happy and children from the economics difficulty will always be behind. It's not a value in an equal, freedom and democratic country in which we should stand up for underprivileged groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...early age. If this letter was followed, theres no human right at all, besides it might...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir to treated kids differently. Despite, how to decide or identify their talents ...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: MY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'may be' or 'might be'?
Suggestion: may be; might be
...n schedule, by training them separately my be a cause-and-effect. Their performance m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...dule, by training them separately my be a cause-and-effect. Their performance may be different bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... who shows talent in language at 3-year doesnt mean it will continue, he or she might ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fferently in schools. Last, talent doesnt mean habit. Childrens thoughts matter, ...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... psychological health of children since theyre not happy and children from the economi...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 321, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...omics difficulty will always be behind. Its not a value in an equal, freedom and de...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96683673469 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68190633019 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8265633857 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256782084043 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083148029254 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06216193899 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155164680735 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402798205236 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.